Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Fwd: A killing state
A killing state
Damien Kingsbury
A person I otherwise like and respect who lives in Southeast Asia forwarded to
me an e-mail purporting to be from the Australian Returned Services League, on
the execution of convicted heroin smuggler Van Nguyen. I say purported because
the e-mail chastised as not ?loyal? Australians who supported the idea of a
minute?s silence to mark Nguyen?s execution, and it is difficult to believe the
RSL would make such a leap of logic.
My Southeast Asian friend was trying to highlight what he sees as Australia?s
hypocrisy in making no fuss about non-Australians who are routinely executed in
neighboring countries. In this, at least, he has my support.
But it did raise the issue of some Australians being opposed to expressions of
concern about the fate of Van Nguyen. Van Nguyen is convicted of a serious
crime and having seen the wasteland that heroin can make of people?s lives, or
their end, and the grief it causes those close to them and to the wider
community, there is clearly a strong case for controlling its availability.
But in some of the comments on Van Nguyen?s situation, there is also an
unpleasant whiff of racism. One wonders whether all those who would let an
Nguyen hang without protest felt equally as relaxed about the jailing of
Schapelle Corby.
More to the point, though, if there is hypocrisy one might look to the source of
the heroin that Van Nguyen was carrying. It was almost certainly from Burma,
which continues as the world?s second largest supplier of heroin, after local
warlords resumed production following the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.
Because of its quasi-state sanctioned trade in drugs, as well as its
consistently appalling human rights record and military dictatorship, Burma is
shunned by most of the world. But Singapore does not shun Burma, and is after
China its second largest foreign investor, trading partner and military
hardware supplier.
The Burmese military ? which is also the government - is deeply involved in the
country?s heroin trade, through direct ownership of growing and refining and
through massive kick-backs from heroin warlords. Heroin funds around half of
Burma?s economy.
In that the Burmese government has recently limited opium production, it has
largely been in areas it does not receive profits from. And much heroin
production has been replaced by production of amphetamines.
Most Singaporean investment in and support for Burma is through official
government contracts, in particular through the Singapore Investment
Corporation and state owned armaments industry. That is, Singapore directly
supports the Burmese military government that is deeply engaged in the
production of heroin and other drugs. But Burmese drug lords are not executed
in Singapore. Rather, they are feted as important businessmen.
Beyond this official hypocrisy, there are two principles concerning the death
sentence generally and in Singapore in particular.
In Singapore, the death sentence is mandatory for possession of as little as 15
grams of heroin. This means there can be no possible reason for the sentence to
be limited, thus taking away the power of the courts to actually judge. If my
family was held hostage under threat of murder, to be released only in return
for carrying a half an ounce of heroin, this could not modify my death sentence
under Singaporean law.
In principle, mandatory sentencing limits and often denies justice.
The second principle concerns the right of the state to kill people. Apart from
Singapore, all of Australia?s Southeast Asian neighbors claim the right to
kill, as does the United States, China and many other countries. The question
is, though, for what offences can the state take life?
To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, one might ask Singapore ? and others ? would you
execute a person for heroin smuggling (or murder, or whatever).
Answer: Yes, we would.
Question: Would you execute a person for the Singaporean crime of chewing gum?
Answer: What do you take us for, murderers?
Response: We have already established what you are. We are now just haggling
over your reasons.
Dr Damien Kingsbury is Director of International and Community Development at
Deakin University, and is author of ?South-East Asia: A Political Profile,
Oxford, 2nd edition 2005
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Tariq Ali: "My compatriots have learned a new word for love: CUBA" (Spanish), (continued)
- [Marxism] Re: Class struggle,
Tony Hartin Tue 29 Nov 2005, 10:32 GMT
- [Marxism] merck takes vioxx failure out on...,
Sudhir Devadas Tue 29 Nov 2005, 07:35 GMT
- [Marxism] Mauritania: "The Mark of Shady Interests",
Walter Lippmann Tue 29 Nov 2005, 06:28 GMT
- [Marxism] Fwd: A killing state,
clintonf Tue 29 Nov 2005, 06:14 GMT
- [Marxism] Michael Hoover, "Rowboat Federalism: The Politics of U.S. Disaster Relief",
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 29 Nov 2005, 05:06 GMT
- Working-Poor Draft Re: [Marxism] "Underprivileged soldier" a myth?,
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 29 Nov 2005, 04:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]