Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Re: Hitchens and Orwell



‘[…]

‘If in Animal Farm Orwell gave us hope (the revolution) and betrayal in equal measure, in Nineteen Eighty-Four he just gives us betrayal. Such indeed was the reaction to the book – and its commercial success was considerable, comfortably outstripping even that of Animal Farm […]

‘Of course, commercial success is no automatic signal of artistic merit; often quite the opposite: "A work a great literary merit is usually too rich in its texture and too subtle in thought and form to lend itself to adventitious exploitation." (Isaac Deutscher, ‘"1984" – The Mysticism of Cruelty’, Marxism, Wars and Revolutions: Essays from Four Decades (London, 1984), p.60.) Indeed the phenomenal success of the book since its publication – many people around the world will only know of Orwell because of Nineteen Eighty-Four – has precisely been a consequence of political context: "The cold-war has created a ‘social demand’ for such an ideological weapon, just as it creates the demand for physical super-weapons." (Ibid., p.60.) On this matter, Raymond Williams too makes an important point: to have had the effect that it had, Nineteen Eighty-Four "had to be written be an ex-socialist. It also had to be someone who shared the general discouragement of the generation: an ex-socialist who had become an enthusiast for capitalism would not have had the same effect". (Politics and Letters, p.390.) It is difficult here to resist a comparison with one of Orwell’s recent chroniclers, Christopher Hitchens (Why Orwell Matters [New York, 2002]), doyen of the "neo-cons", of whom a very similar point could be made. A figure of solid "non-Stalinist" left vintage, his recent conversion to the role of cheerleader for United States imperialism’s recent adventure in Iraq has the considerable weight and effect that it does precisely for these reasons: that it comes from an ex-socialist, who too can be seen to share the "general discouragement" of his generation.’

Full: <http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/Back/Wnext28/Orwell.html>

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]