Re: [Marxism] Re: Pomeranz

["rrubinelli" <rrubinelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Here's a little gasoline for the fire (expensive, but I don't, believe
it or not, own an SUV.  Hell, I don't even own a car):

I think Robert Brenner and Christoper Isett in their work  "England's
Divergence from China's Yangzi Delta:  Property Relations,
Microeconomics and Patterns of Development," answer and rebut Pomeranz's
<The Great Divergence>.  Pomeranz's central assertion that the
divergence is contingent upon England's mercantilism is pretty well
refuted.

rr


----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Feldman" <ffeldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'mxmail'" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 12:01 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Re: Pomeranz


>


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism