Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Workers Party developments
NY Times, October 9, 2005
Scandal Forces Brazil's Top Party to Regroup
By LARRY ROHTER
RIO DE JANEIRO, Oct. 8 - Until a few months ago, Brazil's governing
Workers' Party was seen as Latin America's most successful example of a
political movement on the hard left migrating toward moderate social
democracy. Now, stained by the biggest corruption scandal in the country's
history, the party is frantically trying to regroup and head off a crushing
defeat at the polls next year.
But the choices confronting the party's 800,000 registered members, who
elect a new party president on Sunday, are unpalatable. They can either
vote to reconfirm the existing scandal-tainted leadership or empower a
reform slate that claims to be morally pure but is also calling for a
return to economic policies that voters have repeatedly rejected.
The economic hard-liners have already moved into a commanding position on
the party's national directorate after balloting last month. They argue
that the party can only regain its integrity by returning to its
doctrinaire socialist roots and abandoning the market-friendly policies
that President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has favored.
"The situation is totally contradictory and schizophrenic, and will tend to
become even more so," said Denis Rosenfield, the author of the book "The
Workers' Party at the Crossroads" and a political scientist. "The party is
moving toward the left, and while the government is moving toward the center."
The favorite in the vote is Ricardo Berzoini, until recently the minister
of social welfare. But he is seen as little more than a stalking horse for
José Dirceu. Mr. Dirceu was Mr. da Silva's all-powerful chief of staff
until he was forced to resign in June over corruption allegations, but he
continues to control the Majority Camp faction, which has dominated the
party for the past decade.
"Dirceu is the one who will continue running things, though in a less showy
manner," if Mr. Berzoini defeats Raul Pont, leader of a Trotskyite faction,
Mr. Rosenfield said. "Berzoini has no stature of his own. He's a union
leader used to taking orders and will do whatever Dirceu wants."
After news reports and congressional testimony linked them to a
multimillion-dollar slush fund and other illegal practices, the Workers'
Party's president, secretary general and treasurer all resigned. But the
party has not punished them, content with talk of political "mistakes"
rather than violations of the law.
The party's former secretary general, Silvio Pereira, said last week that
all 21 members of directorate of the party knew that Mr. da Silva's 2002
presidential campaign was financed by the slush fund, which is now the
subject of a congressional inquiry. Other members of the directorate have
issued denials, but there has been no official statement explaining the
origins of the slush fund.
Rather than fight on from the inside, more than 400 founding members of the
party have decided in recent weeks to decamp. The number includes several
members of Congress, most of whom have joined a new left-wing grouping
called the Party of Socialism and Liberty.
As a result, the Workers' Party no longer has the largest delegation in
Congress and has had to give up the privilege of having one of its members
serve as the president of the lower house.
"The party has been completely disfigured," said Hélio Bicudo, one of those
who has left. He predicted that other defections would occur, mainly among
social movements linked to the Roman Catholic Church.
Mr. da Silva, apparently worried that the scandal would taint him
personally and affect his chances for a second term, has also tried to
distance himself from the party that he founded. The president, criticized
early in his term for mixing party and government by wearing a lapel pin
with the party's red star, did not cast a ballot in the election's first
round and explained his absence with the enigmatic response, "I didn't vote
because I didn't vote."
That does not augur well for the party's future. Many experts predict that
its congressional delegation could shrink by as much as half in next year's
election because of voters' disgust with the scandal.
"To build a leadership as strong as Lula's would take a long time, and
there is no place from which it can emerge," said Francisco de Oliveira, a
sociologist and founding member who has left the party. "Lula knows that he
is bigger than the party, which didn't allow other charismatic leaderships
to develop, so I think the Workers' Party needs to prepare for a long winter."
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Re: Pomeranz, (continued)
- [Marxism] American Government's War on Blacks video,
Calvin Broadbent Sun 09 Oct 2005, 15:28 GMT
- [Marxism] Workers Party developments,
Louis Proyect Sun 09 Oct 2005, 14:52 GMT
- [Marxism] "Islamist",
Emrah Goker Sun 09 Oct 2005, 14:18 GMT
- [Marxism] Journal announcement,
Louis Proyect Sun 09 Oct 2005, 14:11 GMT
- [Marxism] Myths About Mao?,
Calvin Broadbent Sun 09 Oct 2005, 13:59 GMT
- [Marxism] Hatchet job on Mao lacks veracity,
Louis Proyect Sun 09 Oct 2005, 13:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]