[Marxism] THE NATURE AS THE SUBJECT OF REVOLUTION

[Mehmet Cagatay <mehmetcagatayaydin@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mr. Stephens wrote:

?But it is critical not to overemphasize that, because the problems we are
seeing aren't a result of incompetence, they are a result of DELIBERATE
POLICY DECISIONS?.

Since I joined Marxmail, I have read many critics on the incompetency of
the Bush administration?s way of dealing with the most crucial issues. It
is a pleasure to see that finally someone has proposed not to be carried
away by the ?critical? mainstream.

If your critique is bounded by the performance of an instrument, at the
same time, your critique is bounded by its possibilities (the best output
of instrument).

As Mr. Stephens implied, aftermath of the ?administrative disaster? in the
most developed country is connected with the planned distribution of
surplus-value.

At this point, one should ask a deliberate question: ?Is there any proper
way of distribution of surplus-value contrary to its nature??

Although I have no doubt about the goodwill of Norman Geras?s concept of
?minimum utopia?, my answer is completely negative.

Once, in a desperate moment, I ?absurdly? stated to a friend of mine that,
the nature will undertake the role of revolutionary subject if none of us
accepts it voluntarily.

It seems the nature have catched up the disregardful movement of
surplus-value on its escape route to Iraq. Unfortunately, the nature is a
pure anarchist...

Mehmet Çagatay
http://weblogmca.blogspot.com/


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism