[Marxism] The London Bombings: Why do marxists hold there tounge?

[Douglas MacDonald <dmacdonald94591@xxxxxxxxx>]

All-

Here is a good piece on the London bombing as a false flag operation. Why do 
modern Marxists hold their tounge when Marx himslef deconstructed the manner in 
which the state weilded power at every turn?  The history of stalinist popular 
fornts, aversion to minoritarianism (need for popular good will) and 
post-modern disenchantment deepen the alienation of the proletariat and its 
festering "vanguard".

Boy what a shocking and hyberbolic thing to say. At least I'm not swearing 
curse words as many comrades on this list enjoy.  My coloful language simply 
exposes what one British author laments...

"The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not
by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth,
but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about
truth."
?Aldous Huxley (author of "Brave New World")

It is easier for the minitorian Marxist idealogues to rally behind the Ralph 
Naders or their "united fronts" than to scientifically challenge the official 
fiction of 911 and the London bombings as propogated ad infinitum by the 
bourgeois state.  Yet, what would have our dear comrade Marx, Lennin or Trotsky 
have done in the face of such commanding menances as "the worldwide threat of 
international terrorism"?  Does their legacy simply speak to accepting at face 
value the word of the bourgeois state on these matters as MOST do on this list? 
 Or does their legacy speak to a weighing and assessing of evidence?

Remeber. in their time, most thought kings/tsars were annoited by God 
himslef....yet a revolution they planted and eventually harvested.

Expose the "War on Terror"...download files and hear first hand the 
deconsstruction of the official fiction at www.takingaim.org.

What will Cindy Sheehan, my fellow local peace activisit here in Solano County 
California be when the next "terrorsit event occurs?  Will it be to critisize 
the capitalist intelligence communities long-standing and DOCUMENTED history of 
false-flag operatiosn or will her wimpers and cry for "a peaceful 
understanding" be drowned out for blood curdling cries for revenge?

-MacDonald

************************

The bombing of the London Underground was a false-flag operation
designed to keep the West mired in war. Don't believe otherwise.

By Matt Hutaff Jul 7, 2005

Only one word sprang to mind when I heard about the bombings that
claimed the lives of dozens of Londoners today ? convenient.

Is there anything convenient in death, or in thousands of lives
destroyed from catastrophe? No ? and words cannot express the sorrow
I feel for the men and women changed by today's events. But
governments with skeletons in their closets have a great deal to
gain from a national tragedy bolstered by "terrorism."

As I sit in my office today, I hear the whispers of co-workers now
utterly convinced our war on terror must continue. Despite American
and British involvement in the Middle East birthing wave after wave
of rebel forces, the Bush doctrine is now justified in the minds of
millions. Petty grievances such as the Downing Street Minutes, the
President's flagging support and Karl Rove's treasonous outing of
CIA agent Valerie Plame are unimportant. A shadowy conglomeration is
out to kill us.

Sound familiar? It should ? the same emotional ploy was used to
great effect on Americans in the wake of September 11th. Question
nothing, particularly your cries for vengeance or that nagging
feeling in the back of your head. Justice delayed is justice denied.

Unlike four years ago, however, I refuse to accept that the attack
on London was anything less than a false-flag operation designed to
enrage Western "civilization" against the Middle East. Why? Because
there is no reason for "terrorist" groups to attack England. As
recently as this week, the Ministry of Defense announced that plans
were being drafted that would pull British armed forces from the
quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. With the British effectively
admitting they're throwing in the towel, the only motivation to stay
could come from an attack that compels the forces to stay and
fight "global terrorism."

Think about it. The attack only benefits empires desperate to
maintain a foothold in the Middle East without further eroding
public opinion. Will Parliament shrug their shoulders and push their
soldiers into longer tours of duty because of this? Obviously it's
too early to tell, but if that happens, insurgents and rebels will
have lost more than they could have ever possibly gained in
destroying part of the Underground.

Brian Kilmeade of Fox News agrees, claiming the sabotage "works
to ... [the] Western world's advantage, for people to experience
something like this together." It doesn't just make "terrorism" an
American problem. It makes it a worldwide problem. The Number One
problem.

No longer do we need to concern ourselves with two world leaders
(who have spawned more worldwide terrorism than any fanatical
religious organization) going unquestioned in their lies that
started a war. We can cast off our sluggish economies, lack of
freedoms and pitiful descent into draconian law. Terror is on the
rise.

I feel like I'm sitting in my apartment watching the World Trade
Center collapse all over again.

Everything is the same, right down to the previously unheard of
Islamic group (The Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe? Are
you kidding me?) taking credit ? even though the translation falls
apart under scrutiny and the Q'uran is improperly cited. Considering
the only Al Qaeda cell to ever be uncovered was a front for the
Mossad, you'd think the perpetrators could at least come up with a
clever new booga-booga name to grab headlines. Their arrogance is
startling.

As is the ever-present Israeli connection, a staple among false flag
operations. Before today's attack, the Israeli Embassy in London was
notified an attack was forthcoming. As a result, former Israeli
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remained in his hotel room rather
than head towards a nearby hotel where he was to address an economic
summit.

The embassy denies it had any prior knowledge, of course, but the
story has changed dramatically in the process. If, as they say,
Netanyahu was not warned, how did he know to stay in his room? How
did he know the danger was so severe that he dare not venture out of
the hotel?

Oops! The story's changed again ? here Netanyahu says that British
police had warned the Israelis (but not the rest of the city?) of a
pending attack. Scotland Yard denies this; Israel's reply was to say
Netanyahu received his warning after the first blast. How? It was
initially reported as a power surge for hours. What is being hidden
here? And why isn't there an investigation into these obvious
discrepancies?

It's enough to make your head spin and your eyes cross with rage.

Regardless, I am making an appeal to Britons who are understandably
wracked with grief at the moment ? don't buy into the hatred the way
we Americans did. Don't ignore the obvious evidence that this whole
affair was orchestrated by your own government. Most importantly,
don't let the deaths of the few, however tragic, plunge your nation
into another fit of war and civic clampdowns.

Toying with your emotions is expected. Don't fall prey to ignorance.
See the attack on your home for what it really is ? a distraction
that will keep your money, resources and troops mired in ceaseless
battle for an ideology that betrays your democratic and civilized
tenets.

Honor your dead with tears, not a cry for war or praise for a
disgraced leader.

Canon Fodder is a weekly analysis of politics and society.




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism