Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Re: The Pom-Pom Treatment
>I think there is a lot that is legitimate in the analysis suggested by
the articles from the Cuban press that Walter reprints here (and are
taken here as sad signs of growing elements of Stalinism, if not worse,
in the Cuban government and society). -Feldman
There is so much to read--and so little time--that I, like many others
I assume, often jump in on only the narrowest of issues.
I can't speak for others, but for me Walter's reproductions here of
those articles that he deems most appropriate are valuable. I don't
read them all, but do look at the headlines and some of the text.
It is Walter's interpretations of them that disturb me. I see the
pronouncements of the Cuban leadership as the necessary pronouncements
of a "State." Any state, whether, capitalist, communist, socialist,
utopian, or whatever, has state interests that it must pursue. State
interests are state interests! And no one can condemn the small Cuban
state, or the greater Soviet one, during both its Leninist and
Stalinist periods for defending itself by diplomacy, arms and trade
deals, etc.
However, what Walter does is take these state pronouncements and
refigure them as political guides to action for Marxist forces. This is
not a trend towards Stalinism by the Cuban leadership. However, so far
as Walter himself is concerned, it is reminiscent of some of the
political psychology of members of communist parties during the Stalin
era.
This was also an unfortunate characteristic of the Lenin era as well.
The political pronouncements of that period were 99% correct (very
little is 100% pure), but what we should now see was that it was 100%
wrong to impose them on fledgling communist parties and for the
aspiring leaders of these parties to advance themselves based on how
quickly they could assimilate Lenin's and Trotsky's thoughts. Today,
those of us who were in the SWP might call it Barnesism, based on the
individual who convinced such disparate people as Feingold, Cannon, and
Dobbs and Kerry that he was their man for the future.
Brian Shannon
_______________________________________________
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]