Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Blair Plays the Terror Card
Is 'One-Nation' Toryism and Imperial chauvinist consciousness about to
experience a renaissance in Britain? Or will Blair go the way of Aznar?
On London: Blair Plays The Terror Card
Paul Joseph Watson/Propaganda Matrix | July 7 2005
The attack on London represents a brutal attempt to coral the British
population behind accepting the introduction of the national ID card,
renewing support for the war on terror and reinvigorating trust in a
government that had the backing of less than 15 per cent of the country.
Even at this very early stage it is clear that the evidence points to inside
involvement.
The statement on a website from an unknown Al-Qaeda group claiming
responsibility is exactly what we'd expect after such an event. Santa Claus
could post a message saying he was responsible for the attack, does that
make it so? Rupert Murdoch's Sky News are busy playing Al-Qaeda training
videos with masked militants jumping through flaming hoops. The emotive
propaganda is clear, these images are being linked in montages with past
images of 9/11, the Bali bombing and the Madrid bombing and injured people
crying in the streets.
Even if the police and government back away from the Al-Qaeda claim, which
now appears to be the case, pro-establishment Neo-Con media outlets will
repeat it like an endless drumbeat until it sinks in.
The key evidence thus far is as follows.
Original Associated Press and Israeli radio reports stated that Binyamin
Netanyahu, the former Israeli Prime Minister received a warning before the
first explosion that an attack was about to take place. Scotland Yard passed
on a warning to the Israeli embassy who forwarded it to Netanyahu. Netanyahu
was due to make a speech at a Hotel adjacent to the site of the first blast.
He cancelled the speech and remained in his hotel room.
Arutz Sheva sourced Army Radio with the following.
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his
way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool
Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."
For an hour after the first blast, the government and the news media were
reporting that the cause was an electrical power surge. If the government
knew bombs were going to go off before they did, why did they report for an
hour that it was an accident? Were they trying to bide time so they could
get their story straight?
Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since denied that they had any
foreknowledge of the attack.
Since the original report, major TV news networks have been completely
silent on the Netanyahu story. They are just repeating claims that there was
no prior knowledge.
About an hour after the story broke, Associated Press started altering their
online news stories, stating that Netanyahu got the warning after the first
blast and not before. It seems as if they are scrambling to co-ordinate
their cover story. Either there were no warnings or the warning was after
the first blast. The dithering seems to suggest there is some confusion on
how to successfully hide the smoking gun, the fact that Netanyahu was warned
before the first explosion.
Why didn't the people on the trains and buses get the same warning?
On June 7th, MI5 downgraded the London terror alert from its second highest
level ?severe general? to a lower category of ?substantial?.
Why did they do this, was somebody lowering the guard?
The timing of the attack is very suspicious, coming on the heels of the
start of the G8 conference. Both Tony Blair and George Bush in their
speeches have tried to paint the attack as an assault on globalization and
the G8 itself. This means that if you're against the G8 and globalization,
then you're with the terrorists! It's a tried and tested method they've used
time and time before.
In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been
caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were
then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the
Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.
The British government has also been caught scripting fake terror alerts for
political effect. Days before the Queen's speech notable November speech in
which she first introduced ID card legislation, ITN news correspondants and
government lobbyists got together to cook up a fake terror alert involving
planes attacking Canary Wharf. A London Independent article later exposed
this as a crass psy-op campaign to get the British people behind the ID
card.
From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind
Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is
always state sponsored.
The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be
police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They
had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish
government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in
the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them
re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the
government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and
kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.
The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at
the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's
happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to
London to take control of the chaos.
BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now
likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union
and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain
from all this? Who has the motive?
We will continue to track developments as they occur and keep our readers
posted
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2005/070705terrorcard.htm
_________________________________________________________________
Winks & nudges are here - download MSN Messenger 7.0 today!
http://messenger.msn.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Trotskyism and the Cuban Revolution - an annotated reference list, (continued)
- [Marxism] Brazilian Opposition Party Admits Destabilizing Objectives,
Walter Lippmann Fri 08 Jul 2005, 13:23 GMT
- [Marxism] Fidel Castro Sends Message of Condolence to British Queen,
Walter Lippmann Fri 08 Jul 2005, 13:21 GMT
- [Marxism] Blair Plays the Terror Card,
Calvin Broadbent Fri 08 Jul 2005, 12:29 GMT
- [Marxism] Fox News Host Happy to See London Attacked,
Calvin Broadbent Fri 08 Jul 2005, 12:26 GMT
- [Marxism] Reflections on the London bombs,
Tony Hartin Fri 08 Jul 2005, 09:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]