Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] re: Sino-Soviet Split and Chinese Invasion of Vietnam
Calvin asks:
>I can see that Vietnam's close ties to
the USSR seem to have irked China (which backed Pol Pot's forces along the
Vietnamese-Cambodian border up until the 1980s); but why?! Was China more
concerned to oust the USSR from the world stage (to further the cause of the
'Third World'?!) than encouraging solidarity between the Vietnamese and
Cambodian victims of US imperialism?
Yes. But that solidarity was already destroyed in China's view when the Viets
went into Cambodia and drove the Khmer Rouge from power. China feared the USSR
enough to ally with the US before the end of the war, and as Vietnam's
leadership forsook its earlier position of balance between Khruschev and Mao in
favor of stronger ties to the Sovs, the Chinese backedPol Pot's demented
empty-the-cities strategy. Feeling like a walnut in theChina-Cambodia
nutcracker, Vietnam made its move to Phnomh Penh. Now China was the nut between
the Soviets and a reunified Vietnam with hegemony [as thePRC loved to say] in
Indochina. In the same immediate postwar period, Hanoi cracked down on the
prosperous Han minority in Vietnam, whom they charged with trying to destablize
the country out of loyalty to Mother China. This was the setting in which China
[as they put it, to 'teach them alesson'] attacked Vietnam.> Why did Pol Pot
fight against the
Vietnamese? What were his reasons for doing so, or was he merely a corrupt
puppet of US imperialism by the early 1980s?Pol Pot, more directly influenced
by Mao than were the Comintern-trainedVietnamese party leaders, shared China's
distrust of Hanoi.Even more, traditional Cambodian-Viet enmity probably played
a role;historically, Khmers felt Viets lorded it over them as Viets felt the
same way about the Chinese Han majority. Old nationalist habits die hard,
especiallywhen both leaders and masses are exhausted from cataclysmic
struggles.Pol Pot was not a puppet but was, objectively, a pawn of the US as it
tried to isolate postwar Vietnam. Deng was a partner.ethan young
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] San Fran./Bay Area Hands Off Venezuela Campaign: short report,
David Walters Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:30 GMT
- [Marxism] labor issue of Monthly Review,
MICHAEL YATES Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:27 GMT
- [Marxism] LCR and rejection of the draft EU Constitution,
Brian Shannon Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:44 GMT
- [Marxism] Deep Throat, hero of Watergate, was COINTELPRO convict,
Brian Shannon Wed 01 Jun 2005, 02:10 GMT
- [Marxism] re: Sino-Soviet Split and Chinese Invasion of Vietnam,
ethan young Wed 01 Jun 2005, 01:36 GMT
- [Marxism] AUSTRALIA: Free all the kids: Mandatory detention must go! - Green Left Weekly #628, June 1, 2005,
glparramatta Wed 01 Jun 2005, 00:32 GMT
- [Marxism] Documentary shows Cuba's Castro as young rebel,
Walter Lippmann Tue 31 May 2005, 21:19 GMT
- [Marxism] Information on Treaty for a Constition for Europe,
Lueko Willms Tue 31 May 2005, 21:11 GMT
- [Marxism] Vicious Circle,
Louis Proyect Tue 31 May 2005, 20:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]