Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] David Graeber
http://insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/18/yale
May 18
Early Exit
Yale University is getting rid of a popular anthropology professor, setting
off protests from supporters who believe he is losing his job for being an
anarchist and for visibly backing graduate student unionization. As the
professor considers filing a formal grievance with the university,
anthropologists and labor officials nationwide have already organized an
online petition signed by 3,000 people.
The decision not to renew David Graeber?s contract after the end of the
2005-6 academic year was made in a private meeting of 12 senior faculty
members who are required to keep the proceedings confidential. (Inside
Higher Ed contacted several who said they could not comment.) In the
absence of an explanation from the panel, Graeber and his supporters insist
that the decision could not have been made based on his work.
?His scholarship was at the level he would have had tenure at any normal
university,? said Marshall Sahlins, an anthropology professor at the
University of Chicago. ?As he has become a more visible anarchist,? added
Andrej Grubacic, a researcher at the State University of New York at
Binghamton, who has worked with Graeber, ?he has encountered more
opposition, fallen out of favor.?
The closed-door review was for promotion from assistant professor to ?term
associate,? an untenured position that Graeber said is usually just a
?rubber stamp,? barring significant problems with teaching, scholarship or
ethics. Graeber passed his first review at Yale, which came at the
three-year mark. The review for term associate comes at the end of his
sixth year, and normally renews the faculty member for four more years,
after which he or she is considered for tenure.
Graeber, a self-avowed anarchist who has supported physical intervention at
corporate globalization conferences, knew his politics were controversial.
Still, he said he passed the third-year review easily, having ?kept my
activism in New York, and scholarship in New Haven.? The opposition began
in the sixth year review, in 2004.
At that time, with a deadlocked vote, the panel gave Graeber a warning. It
did so, admonishing Graeber for ?being unreliable,? he said, ?showing up
late to class, and not doing enough service work.? Graeber denies the
charges, and none of the students interviewed who took his classes said
they recall him having a punctuality problem. The board extended Graeber?s
contract for two, rather than four years, and scheduled a review after the
first year. In the meantime, Graeber organized a colloquium series and got
involved in student projects in response to the criticism about his lack of
service work.
Given his response to the criticism, and his prolific publishing ? two
books and dozens of papers, articles and essays ? Graeber expected to pass
the one-year review, which occurred May 3. Instead, based on a majority
vote by senior anthropology faculty members, he was given a short letter
saying that while the department recognized ?a number of positive qualities
of [Graeber?s] scholarship,? it did not choose to renew his contract.
?It?s normal that these meetings are confidential, but not that no reason
is given at all,? Graeber said. ?I responded to their criticisms, so there
was nothing to say this time, so they just didn?t say anything.? Helaine
Klasky, a Yale spokeswoman, wrote in an e-mail reply to a request for
comment on the situation: ?Personnel matters involving the Yale faculty are
confidential and therefore cannot be discussed.?
Given the information vacuum, Graeber and his supporters assume that his
politics forged his exit, though Klasky suggested otherwise in her e-mail.
?It is the university?s policy that political views of faculty members are
not a factor in decisions about reappointment and/or promotion,? she wrote.
But Graeber said that he first started getting the cold shoulder from some
colleagues after his third year when he became more visible in movements
against the International Monetary Fund and Group of Eight. ?The final
straw,? Graeber suggested, came when he defended a graduate student who he
had mentored earlier this year.
Graeber believed that the student was being treated unfairly because of her
involvement with the Graduate Employees and Students Organization, a
graduate student union that is not recognized by the university and has
been locked in a longstanding battle with Yale administrators. Faculty
members said that the unionization issue is a controversial topic in the
anthropology department, and that some professors have openly expressed
their distaste for the union. There is no evidence that Graeber?s backing
of the student directly led to the decision on his contract. Still, he
thinks it was ?the excuse they needed.?
Anthropologists who find it hard to believe that Graeber was denied
promotion would like some light shed on his review. ?He has published as
much in 10 years as many people do in a lifetime,? said Hylton White, an
anthropology professor at the University of Chicago who knows Graeber from
grad school. ?And given how many students take his classes? ? one course,
Myth and Ritual, drew 137 students ? ?it?s hard to understand. What does
one have to do? I think it?s that secrecy of the process, that?s why so
many people are supporting him.?
Support for him is strong. Thirty-nine Yale graduate students of
anthropology, about two-thirds of the total, have signed a petition
encouraging Yale to keep Graeber. Another 3,000 supporters signed a similar
petition. Signers include a few high profile professors, some anarchists
and union members, and some more unusual self-designations, like signature
number 2,234: ?Tom Welsh ? Human Being.?
Many of Graeber?s staunchest supporters are students, both undergraduate
and graduate, who describe him fondly. Thomas Frampton, an undergraduate
who organized a conference on globalization with Graeber?s help, said that
undergraduate students generally believe Graeber was not renewed because of
his involvement in the anarchy movement. ?I know him as a teacher and as a
mentor who gives himself to the students, and Yale needs that,? he added.
So what is the trouble with David Graeber? ?That?s the problem,? said
White, the Chicago anthropologist. ?You just don?t know, and nobody has to
tell.?
? David Epstein
--
www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Re: Galloway before Congress,
Tony Hartin Wed 18 May 2005, 14:15 GMT
- [Marxism] David Graeber,
Louis Proyect Wed 18 May 2005, 14:08 GMT
- [Marxism] Galloway on Christopher Hitchens,
John Enyang Wed 18 May 2005, 11:53 GMT
- [Marxism] No asylum for Posada!,
Ivan D. Wed 18 May 2005, 08:14 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: The Military Programme of the Proletarian Revolution (was Re: Many Vietna...,
Jscotlive Wed 18 May 2005, 07:44 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]