[Marxism] From the "Baghdad Burning" blog in Iraq: Anatomy of a lie campaign around the "hostage crisis"

["Fred Feldman" <ffeldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Of course, the imperialists who have directly killed tens of thousands
of Iraqis and are probably responsible for a million deaths due to
malnutrition, disease, etc., also tell a lot of lies about the Iraqi
resistance. Including the following, which was reported on earlier from
his knowledge of CNN et al, by Jose Perez. This is from a well-known
Iraqi blogger.
Fred Feldman



The Hostage Crisis...
I'm sure many people have been following the story of the moment in
Iraq: Dozens of Shia hostages taken by Sunni insurgents in a town called
Medain?

The first time we heard about it was a couple of days ago. I was
watching the news subtitles on Arabiya but the subtitle was vague. It
went something like this, "Sunni guerrillas capture 60 hostages in Iraqi
town and will kill them if all Shia do not leave the town." It said
nothing about which town it was, who the guerrillas claimed to be
representing and just how the whole incident happened.

We kept watching the channels and hoping for more information. I
remember reading that subtitle and feeling my heart sink with worry. I
kept checking other news channels and then finally decided to check the
internet. There was another vague news article on Yahoo. This one had a
few more details- the town was Madain, south of Baghdad and the person
who had called in the hostage situation was some sort of high-profile
Shia politician.

News channels were still being vague about it. The only two channels who
were persistently talking about the hostage situation were Arabia and
Iraqia- but the numbers had risen. It was now 150 Shia hostages in
Medain and the Iraqi National Guard and the American army were taking
their positions on the outskirts of the town, preparing for a raid.

Medain is a town of Sunnis and Shia who have lived together peacefully
for as long as anyone can remember. The people in the town come from the
local "Ashayir" or tribes. It's one of those places where everyone knows
everyone else- even if only by name or family name. The tribes who
dominate the town are a combination of Sunni and Shia. Any conflicts
between the townspeople are more of the tribal or family type than they
are religious.

The whole concept of a large number of Sunni guerrillas raiding the town
and taking 60 - 150 of its members (including women and children) was
bizarre, frightening and by the second day of the rumor, a little bit
suspicious.

People in Baghdad didn't believe it. Most of them waved a hand
dismissing the report and said, "They just want to raid Medain." It's a
town that has been giving the Americans quite a bit of trouble this last
year, a part of the Sunni Triangle . Many attacks were reported to have
come from the area, but at the same time, it's not like Falloojeh,
Samarra, or Mosul- it's half Shia. It wouldn't be as easy or politically
correct to raid.

Yesterday, there were actually Shia demonstrators from the town claiming
that the rumors were false and the town was peaceful and there was no
need for a raid or for door-to-door checks.

The last few days, Iraqi officials have been on television claiming that
the whole hostage situation was "under control" and things were going to
be sorted out, except that apparently, there's nothing to sort out.
There have been no reports of hostages, even from the majority of Shia
residents themselves. Someone mentioned that it was possible a couple of
people had been abducted, but it had nothing to do with Sunni guerrillas
chasing out Shia.

Now, Associated Press is claiming,

"The confusion over Madain illustrated how quickly rumors spread in a
country of deep ethnic and sectarian divides, where the threat of
violence is all too real."

Uhm, no. Not really. See, this whole thing didn't start out as a rumor.
Rumors come to you through actual people- the guy who brings you
kerosene spreads rumors, that neighbor next door brings you rumors, the
man you get your rations from spreads rumors. This came to us, very
decidedly, from a news source. It first made its debut as breaking news
and came from an "Iraqi Shia official who wished to remain unnamed". The
official should have to answer to the rumor he handed over to the press.

And now.

Shiite leaders and government officials had earlier estimated 35 to 100
people were taken hostage, but residents disputed the claim, with some
saying they had seen no evidence any hostages were taken.

We know a lot of our new officials and spokespeople are blatantly lying
and it's fine to lie about security, reconstruction and democracy- we've
gotten used to it. In fact, we tell jokes about it and laugh about it at
family gatherings or over the telephone. To lie about something as
serious as Sunni-Shia hostage taking is another story altogether. It's
unacceptable and while Sunnis and Shia were hardly going to take up arms
against each other over this latest debacle, but it was still extremely
worrisome and for people who wish to fuel sectarian violence, it was a
perfect opportunity.

We have an Iraqi government that bans news channels and newspapers
because they *insist* on reporting about such routine things as civilian
casualties and raids, yet the Puppets barely flinch over media sources
spreading a rumor as dangerous and provocative as this one.

- posted by river @ 1:06 PM


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism