Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Marxism] Should socialists call for democratic structural change? Was Wassup?



I think your thoughts are spot-on Brian.

Sure, we can all bemoan the shortcomings of our democratic republic and
bourgeois electoral politics. That's all too easy. The key is to imagine
what sort of society we want to live in and then plan on how to get there.

Marxists should be working towards both short and long-term improvements to
the situation of the working class and the majority of the country. That
work will automatically involve education and a political activation of the
working class. The idea that we should bide our time while waiting for
things to get worse and then joyfully support the uprising that results from
that situation is the worst application of anarchist thought.

Today, we face a grave situation as the fragile elements of what little
democratic processes we do have are under attack from fascists who seek to
control the world and reshape the world's economy into an imperial fantasy of
laissez-faire capitalism. Today, to take a position of not advocating
progressive reform of bourgeois democracy is worse than doing nothing -- it
could pave the way for the firm establishment of fascism. As such, your
positions are very sound.

>>Issue 1: The Senate functions exactly as the “founders” intended,
> It works as the founders intended over 200 years ago, but many
> constitutions have been created since then.

I don't disagree with either of your statements about the undemocratic
nature of the Senate -- both in design and in practice -- but I would like to
add one thought:

Perhaps one could imagine a role of the Senate in representing the states
in the original 1780s era of the US republic. In that era, the Senate fit
into the idea of states rights and of a union or confederation of states with
those states having distinct rights and powers.

Today, the 10th Amendment has long been defacto abolished. Today, states
only have whatever rights and privileges that Washington allows them to have.
Whatever vestiges of legitimacy the Senate ever had are long, long gone.

In solidarity.

--
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." --
George Orwell

_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]