Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] re:Buying off the German people [carlos], and Greens [david]
- To: "Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] re:Buying off the German people [carlos], and Greens [david]
- From: "Ian Pace" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:50:38 -0000
From: "M. Junaid Alam" <mjunaidalam@xxxxxxxxxx>
The problem with the Greens in being mostly white and mostly middle
class -
well, that is the "problem" with most of us. I don't think it's necessary
to fret too much about this in the sense that we have to start off
somewhere,
and we are obviously starting off at the beginning. If the leftist Greens
have good politics, then who cares what their specific backgrounds are.
Any
socialist/radical group in this country of any size doing good work in any
area
of activism is basically the same . If we could start off at where we are
supposed to end up - with all the good "ordinary" folks already lined up
among us - well then things would be rather easy and we'd be living in a
utopia.
It's vulgar reductionism typical of the Trotskyist movement, and probably
others, to dismiss people as having "petty-bourgeois" backgrounds as a
means of avoiding the real issues. Historically, most revolutionary
upsurges in history were led in some major way theoretically and/or
politically by that layer in society directly above the masses. Anarchists
do a lot of handwringing on this subject when harping on Lenin's concept
of "professional revolutionaries", but the historical record cannot be
denied on this score. Middle class layers - professionals,
intellectuals, writers - can be leaders of mass movements. The real
question is only whether they individually choose to adopt the defense of
the masses or become traitors
or simply remain aloof. And that depends on the individual. To suggest
otherwise is vulgarized Marxism.
That's not vulgarised Marxism, it's a serious scepticism about how reliable
the allegiances of middle class people can be, and how their 'defence of the
masses' might manifest itself upon leading a movement which gained power (a
very real question with respect the history of Eastern European communism).
A mass movement primarily led by middle class people should always be
questioned. If you want to call that Trotskyist reductionism, then so be it.
Solidarity,
Ian
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]