Re: [Marxism] More conspiracy theories: Europeans Investigate CIARolein Abductions PART 1

["bob" <bobo926@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

You wrote "The trouble with all this groundless speculation is that it
obscures the
very real conspiracy over 9/11 for which we have real evidence...that
is, that the legacy of airlines deregulation and the privatization of
security created a window of opportunity for terrorists to hijack planes
and fly them into buildings.  "

stretching it just a bit, don't you think?
for us to describe 911 as being due to lack of security?

bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lause" <MLause@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition'"
<marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Marxism] More conspiracy theories: Europeans Investigate
CIARolein Abductions PART 1


> double bluff wrote, "Not surprisingly, after being ridiculed by every
> political faction, in many cases their deductions are proved quite
> correct many years later. I would expect that marxists are aware of the
> importance of 9/11 for real capitalism and imperialism, and I don't
> think it is the case that I elaborate on this quite obvious key point.
> Moreover, from a historical perspective, you remember at least two other
> instances when a US government simulated to be attacked in order to wage
> a war: do you remember the Maine? and the gulf of Tonkin?"
>
> Actually, this list could be expanded to the Lusitania, the
> Mexican-invasion-of-the-U.S. scam for starting the War with Mexico, etc.
> None of this proves anything unless it's being suggested the U.S. sunk
> the Maine and the Lusitania?  Or that the U.S. attacked its ships in the
> Gulf of Tonkin?  While I don't think they value the lives of Americans
> any more than those of anyone else in the world, does anyone seriously
> think they'd destroy the WTC?
>
> The underlying logic of this point, though, seems to be that because
> conspiracies exist and were ridiculed, ridiculous speculations about
> 9/11 must be treated seriously.  That way lies madness...or at least a
> brooding Fox Mulder...or maybe Bert Gummer...or, at least, a highly
> animated Dale Gribble.
>
> The official account of what happened on 9/11 is very different than the
> JFK assassination where the bits and pieces just don't add up.  The
> official story for 9/11 doesn't require believing that a plane slammed
> into two buildings seven times.
>
> The trouble with all this groundless speculation is that it obscures the
> very real conspiracy over 9/11 for which we have real evidence...that
> is, that the legacy of airlines deregulation and the privatization of
> security created a window of opportunity for terrorists to hijack planes
> and fly them into buildings.
>
> Solidarity!
> Mark L.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marxism mailing list
> Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism