Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Socialist tasks versus national tasks?
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Socialist tasks versus national tasks?
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:06:24 -0500
David Walter:
I don't think the quotes prove Louis' points at all.
Really?
When this topic first came up in December 2003, you wrote the following to
the list:
>>Second note, Louis, all, for those interested, and a document that
leans a little more to Louis' point of view in terms of marxist method
is actually not the stuff Louis has cited as much, but Trotsky's
excellent piece on this very issue entitled: "Between Red and White". I
have it listed as a "significant work" on the TIA index page.
Written in 1922 while Trotsky was still Commissar of Military Affairs,
it presents one of the best Marxist works on self-determination "under
socialism". It deals specifically with the "Georgian Affair" and
reflects Soviet Gov't views on this, albeit it's penned by Trotsky.
Some of the chapter titles relevant to this discussion are:
8. Democracy and the Soviet system
9. Self-determination and the revolution
10. ?Public opinion?, Social Democracy, Communism
This work is little known but it should be widely read, IMO as a
contribution to this discussion:
www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1922-rw/index.htm<<
Here's a snippet from chapter 9:
>>The ?Realpolitik? of today necessitates the conformity of the interests
of the workers? state with the conditions created by the fact of its being
surrounded by large and small bourgeois nationalist-democratic states. We
were actuated by such considerations based on an accurate valuation of
existing facts, when we maintained our attitude of patience and toleration
towards Georgia. But when this attitude, after a long period of trial, did
not give us even the most elementary guarantees of safetywhen the
principle of self-determination became, in the hands of General Walker and
Admiral Dumesnil, a juridical guarantee for counter-revolution which was
preparing a new attack upon uswe did not and could not see any moral
obstacle in introducing, at the call of the revolutionary vanguard of
Georgia, our Red Army, in order to help the workers and poorest peasants
with the least possible delay and sacrifice to overthrow that pitiful
democracy which had destroyed itself by its own policy.
We do not only recognize, but we also give full support to the principle of
self-determination, wherever it is directed against feudal, capitalist and
imperialist states. But wherever the fiction of self-determination, in the
hands of the bourgeoisie, becomes a weapon directed against the proletarian
revolution, we have no occasion to treat this fiction differently from the
other ?principles? of democracy perverted by capitalism.<<
--
www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]