Re: [Marxism] Sexism and pseudoscience

[Rod Holt <rholt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wrong Again!
You cannot assume homosexual couples are infertile, or assert it as a
fact just because fewer than 20% of gay men give birth. All this is
another myth.
      --rod

Charles Brown wrote:

> Rod Holt
>
> Phil Gasper, author of "Behind the Claim ..." posted by Louis on Feb.
> 23, shows that pseudo- journalism can overwhelm almost anything. In
> places, it brings tears to my eyes, which is a biological explanation
> for....
> Just one example------
>
> I quote:
> DEVELOPMENTS IN genetics, biotechnology and brain research over the past
> 15 years have boosted attempts to explain social inequalities and other
> social problems in biological terms.
> Despite [sic] this, efforts to explain aspects of human behavior--from
> schizophrenia to homosexuality to "criminality"--in genetic terms have
> not produced any credible results. The McGill University neuroscientist
> Evan Balaban has described such research as representing a "hierarchy of
> worthlessness."
> end quote.
>
> This is so wrong!
> On homosexuality there IS overwhelming proof. In 95 % of the cases,
> homosexuals have heterosexual parents. In 99.9% of the cases, at least
> one parent is heterosexual. No one in their right mid can deny that
> hetrosexuality is an essential precondition for homosexuality, and THAT
> is genetics. George Blander, a geneticist at SFU, agrees emphatically. A
> research team reported the same results in a  recent paper on the subject.
>       --rod
>
>
> ^^^^^^
> CB: Could the fact that same-sex is not fertile impact this empirical result
> ?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marxism mailing list
> Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism