Re: Intelligent design, "irreducible complexity" and evolution [Was:Re: [Marxism] "intelligent design"]

[Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike Friedman wrote:
>
> You made the link, not me. I linked "intelligent design" with creation
> science. Are you a proponent of intelligent design? If not, you don't have
> anything to worry about. If you are, then the shoe fits.
>

Mike, I'm beginning to wonder why you bother to reply in this thread.
Anyone who takes intelligent  design or creationism seriously as science
is not worth arguing with unless there are bystanders who might be
confused. I don't think there are on the marxism list. Ignore him.

What even marxists are apt to find confusing in the field of biology are
the various idiocies proceding from sociobiology or evolutionary
psychology. I understand the NYT recently printed that slimeball Murray
on their op-ed page commenting on the Summers stink at Harvard. These
matters need more comment by leftists with biological training.

Carrol


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism