Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Radek and Limonov [was: Re: [Marxism] Radek and National-Bolshevism
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Radek and Limonov [was: Re: [Marxism] Radek and National-Bolshevism
- From: Michael Sims <mjsbpmagen-mxmail@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:40:21 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
Looking for a simple no-snag answer:
If there were a trade descriptions law defining the minimum
characteristics which a party or movement must be possess before it
could claim to be "marxist" and "bolshevik" respectively, what would
they be?
Or, if you prefer, which characteristics would definitely disqualify it
(apart from economic policies)?
Michael
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Message from Islamic Jihad Army to US troops,
Fred Feldman Wed 05 Jan 2005, 12:12 GMT
- [Marxism] Bring 100,000 tsunami refugees to Australia,
Ozleft Wed 05 Jan 2005, 12:07 GMT
- [Marxism] The coming DSP conference,
Ozleft Wed 05 Jan 2005, 11:59 GMT
- Radek and Limonov [was: Re: [Marxism] Radek and National-Bolshevism,
Zivko Vukolaj Wed 05 Jan 2005, 10:25 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: On Iraq,
Michael Sims Wed 05 Jan 2005, 07:58 GMT
- [Marxism] Test_post#3_ignore (just for Les),
SysOut Wed 05 Jan 2005, 06:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]