Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Marxism] rwrainey5@aol.com
- To: "'Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition'" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Marxism] rwrainey5@aol.com
- From: Joaquín Bustelo <jbustelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:31:39 -0500
- Thread-index: AcTaXetvlH57xjNbRU+H0sffZEWyiQAAnrKQ
Rachel writes: "I am puzzled by the virulent reaction to my posts on
mullahs, priests, rabbis, shamans, what-have-you. If I seemed to single out
one over the other. I apologize. I despise them all, and I am surprised,
on a Marxism list, to watch others rush to their defense."
The reason for this shouldn't be impossible to understand. You identify the
Iraqi resistance as primarily an *ideological* phenomenon. You say what it
represents is Islam, which (by your lights) is equally (as you now hasten to
add) is *just as* reactionary as Christianity, etc.
I have a very different approach. Ideology is not the decisive criteria,
social forces are. The Iraqi resistance from my point of view is not the
expression of a particular religious faith, but of a nation that is the
target of a war of conquest by imperialism and is resisting that conquest.
You proclaim yourself neutral in this war. Your thesis is basically the
neocon "clash of civilizations" crap that the corporate media constantly
propagandizes, except that instead of openly favoring the imperialist side,
you have an ostensibly neutral "plague on both your houses" position.
Your position is thus atypical, not just among pretty much everyone on this
list or on the left, but among the big majority of working people in the
United States, especially Blacks and Latinos, and the absolute crushing
majority of working people on a world scale, who oppose the U.S. war.
Moreover, it is a completely untenable position. Given an actual invasion by
YOUR OWN imperialism done in YOUR name with YOUR money and YOUR friends,
neighbors and relatives as cannon fodder, you're like the Pierre of the
children's story: "I don't care." So your ostensible neutrality favors one
side over the other: perhaps someone on the Moon can claim neutrality, but
not where you sit.
Thus your position is quite reactionary. As for the rest of it, whatever
your intentions, it mostly echoes the racist ideology of broader U.S.
society.
Yet you express bemused surprise that anyone could possibly object to your
rants against "mullahs" on a Marxism list, calling the reactions "virulent."
Wake up and smell the Napalm, Rachel. Fallujah is burning. All of Iraq is
burning.
Joaquín
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- RE: [Marxism] a few thoughts on flaming and so forth, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] rwrainey5@aol.com,
RWRAINEY5 Sun 05 Dec 2004, 00:03 GMT
- [Marxism] Left Hook fund-drive,
Louis Proyect Sat 04 Dec 2004, 23:58 GMT
- [Marxism] Student sues High School to start anarchist group,
Doug Smiley Sat 04 Dec 2004, 23:24 GMT
- [Marxism] Join the Healthcare Workers Picket of Vallejo Mayor Intintoli, Sun 1pm 912 Georgia St, Vallejo,
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Sat 04 Dec 2004, 22:22 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: Flame wars,
Fred Feldman Sat 04 Dec 2004, 21:12 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]