Re: [Marxism] So it won't be a Leninist party-right?Toes spread part 2

[Adam <cleon42@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- "acpollack2@xxxxxxxx" <acpollack2@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> What Adam says is reasonable, and an accurate take on the ISO. But
> it's an example of the difficulties I mentioned yesterday. On the
> face of it, it is not sufficient reason to rule out regroupment with
> the ISO on the basis of the broad criteria drawn by
> Cochranite/Solidarity principles of regroupment.

I don't rule it out; I just don't think it's in the cards in the very
near term. Within a couple of years, maybe. But not tomorrow. Or next
week.

As it stands now, the only way regroupment would happen is if Soli
dissolved and joined the ISO en masse. Not going to happen; even if it
did, I certainly wouldn't be welcome in the ISO, given my disagreement
with "state capitalist" theory and their anti-Cuba position.

For there to be true fusion between the ISO and Soli in any meaningful
way, the ISO's going to have to drop a considerable chunk of its
political monoculture.

Adam


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism