Re: [Marxism] So it won't be a Leninist party-right?Toes spread part 2

[Adam <cleon42@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One such
> indication would have been a fusion with the ISO. For the life of me,
> I
> can't see why it didn't happen.

Many people in Soli, myself included, don't want to move too quickly on
this.

The ISO and Soli's leadership have agreed that, since our perspectives
are similar in a lot of areas, we should work together as much as
possible. That's a Good Thing. However, the ISO has not miraculously
become non-sectarian; they still believe in the "One Program to Rule
Them All" approach. A lot of people in Soli--again, myself
included--would *love* to see a fusion between the two groups, but
honestly, it's just not in the cards for the immediate future. We
should keep working together where possible and trying to dialogue
more, but until the shift in the ISO's organizational perspective
becomes more pronounced, it's just not going to happen.

Adam


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism