Re: [Marxism] So it won't be a Leninist party-right?Toes spread part 2

["acpollack2@xxxxxxxx" <acpollack2@xxxxxxxx>]

I read the Cochranite piece and the "Barnes" speech, both of which contain many 
good points. As a Trotskyist I have to grapple with the question of why my 
movement's history is plagued with splits -- and I don't have any clue yet (but 
I'm working on it). Having said that I feel it's fair to ask Louis why isn't he 
in Solidarity, whose organizational conception is Cochranite?

-- Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jerry foster wrote:
>  Louis-I want to Think it over and read it over -but
> what I got from a qiuck first reading was that it
> won't be a Vanguard party-Right? Jerry

No, it will be a vanguard party. But in order to develop a true
vanguard, Marxists will have to dispense with "vanguardist" misconceptions.

--
Marxism list: www.marxmail.org


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism