Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] risky pensions
Today?s Times notes the difference in the soundness of traditional pension
plans investing in bonds and those investing in stocks recommended by Wall
Street advisers. (?UNDONE BY MARKET RISK: A Premature Sunset for Pension
Plans??, By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH,
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/weekinreview/28wals.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print&position=).
The example it uses is a Texas teachers? fund, but a month or so ago a
similar comparison was made between a healthy Teamster regional plan, invested
in real estate, and one in deep trouble which, under government trusteeship,
was handed over to Wall Street and invested in stocks.
Meanwhile Bush is about to do the equivalent to the nation?s pension plan, i.e.
Social Security, and the Times also reveals today that his plan for personal
investment accounts will require massive borrowing. So not only will the
individual accounts be risky but the net macroeconomic effect will be to take
funds away from saving that could be used for other purposes.
(http://nytimes.com/2004/11/28/politics/28secure.html?ei=5094&en=cd5a720c6da1c654&hp=&ex=1101704400&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print&position=)
At the end of the first article the author reports: ?Some pension specialists
... argue that without the incentives to manage pensions aggressively,
employers and Wall Street would turn their backs on pensions entirely.... But
funds that ignored those incentives all along - like the '50 fund and Texas
Municipal - are doing just fine.?
As corporations and the government continue to endanger our pensions, private
and public, labor is going to have to find a way to take management?s hands off
our money and to demand a unified national pension plan at decent levels, under
the supervision and control of workers. The first steps in getting there are
to defend Social Security; to act in solidarity with those, like airline
workers, currently fighting to save their pensions; and to rebuild the Labor
Party and promote its social security plank.
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] IRSP: The Plough 2.15,
Danielle Ni Dhighe Sun 28 Nov 2004, 19:49 GMT
- [Marxism] Total casualties well above 9% - over 25, 000 - Editor and Publisher Nov 25, 2004,
Ralph Johansen Sun 28 Nov 2004, 19:38 GMT
- [Marxism] Correction re not about SWP,
Brian Shannon Sun 28 Nov 2004, 19:21 GMT
- [Marxism] More than a trillion dollars worth of global privatisation,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 28 Nov 2004, 18:55 GMT
- [Marxism] risky pensions,
acpollack2@xxxxxxxx Sun 28 Nov 2004, 18:54 GMT
- [Marxism] Thomas Frank book review,
Louis Proyect Sun 28 Nov 2004, 18:50 GMT
- [Marxism] Discussion is not about the SWP,
Brian Shannon Sun 28 Nov 2004, 18:22 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] SWP: "U.S. troops consolidate victory in Fallujah",
Fred Feldman Sun 28 Nov 2004, 18:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]