Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] SWP post-election analysis
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] SWP post-election analysis
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:44:00 -0500
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
(I don't want to open up big discussion about this extremely marginal
ultraleft sect in the USA that many Marxmailers, including me, used to
belong to, but this article linking ABB'ers to Murray and Herrnstein's
"The Bell Curve" is one of the oddest things I've ever read. Not only is
the connection utterly preposterous; it also fails to characterize the
*racist* character of the book. That's what the controversy was about,
not rationalizing middle-class privileges.)
The Militant
Vol. 68/No. 43 November 23, 2004
Middle-class contempt for workers
fuels liberal panic over U.S. elections
BY ARGIRIS MALAPANIS
(clip)
Most professionals, Hollywood entertainers and producers, newspaper
columnists, novelists and other writers, television newscasters, and
university professors in the United States today are liberals. These are
among the social layers that Kerry appealed to. They include former
radicals who three or four decades ago were Maoists, or belonged to the
Weather Underground or other groups on the “left.” Many of these people
today live in apartment buildings or housing complexes with security
guards. As capitalism’s economic crisis marches on, they become more
fearful of losing their privileges and their contempt for workers
increases. This “Bell Curve” bias of aging radicals and middle-class
liberals is resented more and more by working people.
The Bell Curve is a book by Charles Murray and Richard Hernstein [sic]
that was released in 1994. Its publication caused a scandal in the
bourgeoisie. The reason for the scandal? In the debate around the book,
both supporters and critics, liberals and conservatives alike, were
forced to acknowledge that capitalist society necessitates maintaining a
class hierarchy—which is a product of social relations, not a biological
fact—that permanently denies equality to the majority of human beings,
those who work for living.
The book’s purpose was to provide a rationalization for better-off
layers of professionals and the middle class—those the authors call “the
cognitive elite”—as to why they deserve to be richer and more
comfortable than the great majority of humanity; it’s because they are
supposedly smarter. It was aimed at middle-class liberals, in
particular. “Quit denying it!” was the message of the authors. “You
deserve to be better off. It’s necessary, especially in this
computerized and hi-tech world we’re living in.”
--
The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Gary Leupp on the trial of Sendero's Guzman,
Charlie Parks Sat 13 Nov 2004, 00:24 GMT
- [Marxism] Bush avoiding course of ultraright [?!?!?!],
Walter Lippmann Fri 12 Nov 2004, 22:47 GMT
- [Marxism] RE SWP post-election analysis,
Ilyenkova Fri 12 Nov 2004, 21:53 GMT
- [Marxism] GREAT QUOTES BY GREAT LADIES,
Ralph Johansen Fri 12 Nov 2004, 20:45 GMT
- [Marxism] SWP post-election analysis,
Louis Proyect Fri 12 Nov 2004, 19:44 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]