Re: [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same

To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same
From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:37:37 -0500

Josh Saxe wrote:
>
> Junaid wrote:
>
I'd appreciate it if you'd rework this, it would make an
> interesting discussion to which many of the older subscribers to
> marxmail could contribute: did the left, in the 1960's/70's, "abandon
> the working class"?

No.

Carrol

_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism

References:
- RE: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes...
  - From: Joaquín
- [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same
  - From: Carrol Cox
- Re: [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same
  - From: Lance Murdoch
- Re: [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same
  - From: Josh Saxe

Prev by Date: [Marxism] Petty gossip department
Next by Date: [Marxism] Labor Forum In Los Angeles
Previous by thread: Re: [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same
Next by thread: Fwd: Re: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [Marxism] "Unions" & "Workers" are not the same, (continued)
  - Fwd: Re: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes..., paul bunyan Sat 30 Oct 2004, 18:11 GMT
    - Re: Re: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes..., Josh Saxe Sun 31 Oct 2004, 01:20 GMT
  - Re: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes..., Octob1917 Sun 31 Oct 2004, 01:47 GMT
  - Re: [Marxism] Camejo and Shawki/ISO and so it goes..., Ilyenkova Sun 31 Oct 2004, 03:18 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]