Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] RE religion and opium
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] RE religion and opium
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:17:57 -0400
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
V.I. Lenin, "Socialism and Religion" (1905):
So far as the party of the socialist proletariat is concerned, religion
is not a private affair. Our Party is an association of class-conscious,
advanced fighters for the emancipation of the working class. Such an
association cannot and must not be indifferent to lack of
class-consciousness, ignorance or obscurantism in the shape of religious
beliefs. We demand complete disestablishment of the Church so as to be
able to combat the religious fog with purely ideo logical and solely
ideological weapons, by means of our press and by word of mouth. But we
founded our association, the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party,
precisely for such a struggle against every religious bamboozling of the
workers. And to us the ideological struggle is not a private affair, but
the affair of the whole Party, of the whole proletariat.
If that is so, why do we not declare in our Programme that we are
atheists? Why do we not forbid Christians and other believers in God to
join our Party?
The answer to this question will serve to explain the very important
difference in the way the question of religion is presented by the
bourgeois democrats and the Social-Democrats.
Our Programme is based entirely on the scientific, and moreover the
materialist, world-outlook. An explanation of our Programme, therefore,
necessarily includes an explanation of the true historical and economic
roots of the religious fog. Our propaganda necessarily includes the
propaganda of atheism; the publication of the appropriate scientific
literature, which the autocratic feudal government has hitherto strictly
forbidden and persecuted, must now form one of the fields of our Party
work. We shall now probably have to follow the advice Engels once gave
to the German Socialists: to translate and widely disseminate the
literature of the eighteenth-century French Enlighteners and atheists.{1}
But under no circumstances ought we to fall into the error of posing the
religious question in an abstract, idealistic fashion, as an
“intellectual” question unconnected with the class struggle, as is not
infrequently done by the radical-democrats from among the bourgeoisie.
It would be stupid to think that, in a society based on the endless
oppression and coarsening of the worker masses, religious prejudices
could be dispelled by purely propaganda methods. It would be bourgeois
narrow-mindedness to forget that the yoke of religion that weighs upon
mankind is merely a product and reflection of the economic yoke within
society. No number of pamphlets and no amount of preaching can enlighten
the proletariat, if it is not enlightened by its own struggle against
the dark forces of capitalism. Unity in this really revolutionary
struggle of the oppressed class for the creation of a paradise on earth
is more important to us than unity of proletarian opinion on paradise in
heaven.
That is the reason why we do not and should not set forth our atheism in
our Programme; that is why we do not and should not prohibit
proletarians who still retain vestiges of their old prejudices from
associating themselves with our Party. We shall always preach the
scientific world-outlook, and it is essential for us to combat the
inconsistency of various “Christians”. But that does not mean in the
least that the religious question ought to be advanced to first place,
where it does not belong at all; nor does it mean that we should allow
the forces of the really revolutionary economic and political struggle
to be split up on account of third-rate opinions or senseless ideas,
rapidly losing all political importance, rapidly being swept out as
rubbish by the very course of economic development.
full: http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1905/dec/03.htm
--
The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]