[Marxism] Jesus and Jihad

["andypollack@xxxxxxxx" <andypollack@xxxxxxxx>]

Kristof draws a direct link between Christian fundamentalism as a mass 
phenomenon and atrocities in Iraq, and generally paints the fundis as every bit 
as bloodthirsty and willing to countenance mass murder as Islamic 
fundamentalists.

Particularly scary, although hardly news, is the number of the "Left Behind" 
books sold.  But not surprising in the world's most powerful  country, which 
maintains its internal dominance over workers and the oppressed with ever new 
forms of mass mystification. (Frank Rich has a great piece today in the Times 
on the dumbing down of network news into infotainment, which is part of the 
same stultifying culture inhibiting questioning and encouraging superstition. 
What else is trust in Bush (or Kerry) but belief in myth?)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 17, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Jesus and Jihad
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

If the latest in the "Left Behind" series of evangelical thrillers is to be 
believed, Jesus will return to Earth, gather non-Christians to his left and 
toss them into everlasting fire:

"Jesus merely raised one hand a few inches and a yawning chasm opened in the 
earth, stretching far and wide enough to swallow all of them. They tumbled in, 
howling and screeching, but their wailing was soon quashed and all was silent 
when the earth closed itself again."

These are the best-selling novels for adults in the United States, and they 
have sold more than 60 million copies worldwide. The latest is "Glorious 
Appearing," which has Jesus returning to Earth to wipe all non-Christians from 
the planet. It's disconcerting to find ethnic cleansing celebrated as the 
height of piety.

If a Muslim were to write an Islamic version of "Glorious Appearing" and 
publish it in Saudi Arabia, jubilantly describing a massacre of millions of 
non-Muslims by God, we would have a fit. We have quite properly linked the 
fundamentalist religious tracts of Islam with the intolerance they nurture, and 
it's time to remove the motes from our own eyes.

In "Glorious Appearing," Jesus merely speaks and the bodies of the enemy are 
ripped open. Christians have to drive carefully to avoid "hitting splayed and 
filleted bodies of men and women and horses."

"The riders not thrown," the novel continues, "leaped from their horses and 
tried to control them with the reins, but even as they struggled, their own 
flesh dissolved, their eyes melted and their tongues disintegrated. . . . 
Seconds later the same plague afflicted the horses, their flesh and eyes and 
tongues melting away, leaving grotesque skeletons standing, before they, too, 
rattled to the pavement."

One might have thought that Jesus would be more of an animal lover.

These scenes also raise an eschatological problem: Could devout fundamentalists 
really enjoy paradise as their friends, relatives and neighbors were heaved 
into hell?

As my Times colleague David Kirkpatrick noted in an article, this portrayal of 
a bloody Second Coming reflects a shift in American portrayals of Jesus, from a 
gentle Mister Rogers figure to a martial messiah presiding over a sea of blood. 
Militant Christianity rises to confront Militant Islam.

This matters in the real world, in the same way that fundamentalist Islamic 
tracts in Saudi Arabia do. Each form of fundamentalism creates a stark moral 
division between decent, pious types like oneself ? and infidels headed for 
hell.

No, I don't think the readers of "Glorious Appearing" will ram planes into 
buildings. But we did imprison thousands of Muslims here and abroad after 9/11, 
and ordinary Americans joined in the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in part 
because of a lack of empathy for the prisoners. It's harder to feel empathy for 
such people if we regard them as infidels and expect Jesus to dissolve their 
tongues and eyes any day now.

I had reservations about writing this column because I don't want to mock 
anyone's religious beliefs, and millions of Americans think "Glorious 
Appearing" describes God's will. Yet ultimately I think it's a mistake to treat 
religion as a taboo, either in this country or in Saudi Arabia.

I often write about religion precisely because faith has a vast impact on 
society. Since I've praised the work that evangelicals do in the third world 
(Christian aid groups are being particularly helpful in Sudan, at a time when 
most of the world has done nothing about the genocide there), I also feel a 
responsibility to protest intolerance at home.

Should we really give intolerance a pass if it is rooted in religious faith?

Many American Christians once read the Bible to mean that African-Americans 
were cursed as descendants of Noah's son Ham, and were intended by God to be 
enslaved. In the 19th century, millions of Americans sincerely accepted this 
Biblical justification for slavery as God's word ? but surely it would have 
been wrong to defer to such racist nonsense simply because speaking out could 
have been perceived as denigrating some people's religious faith.

People have the right to believe in a racist God, or a God who throws millions 
of nonevangelicals into hell. I don't think we should ban books that say that. 
But we should be embarrassed when our best-selling books gleefully celebrate 
religious intolerance and violence against infidels.

That's not what America stands for, and I doubt that it's what God stands for.



Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | 
Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top



________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism