Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Re: ISO and Farber



Paul Bunyan writes, "There is nothing in the article (ISR interview with Samuel
Farber)to indicate that Farber is anything more than a critic from the left, of
the Cuban leadership," and then asks, "How does Farber stand out from other
Trotskyists," who also see Cuba as Stalinist? Firstly, while careful to avoid
supporting overt moves against the Cuban revolution like the U.S. embargo and
not denying the obvious progress made in popular welfare since 1959, Farber
openly identifies himself as an opponent of the regime. Not a critic; an
opponent. This is consistent with all his writings on Cuba (i.e New Politics,
Summer 1995, Review of Benglesdorf's Problems of Democracy in Cuba). As
previous postings have noted, Farber has expressed his opposition repeatedly,
to the point of claiming treatment of dissidents as psychiatric patients as in
the former USSR. While Trotskyists may see the Cuban state as seriously flawed,
whether characterizing it a deformed worker's state, a transitional
formation between capitalism and socialism, or something such, all lend it
"critical support." Such support extends both to its struggle against
imperialism, and to its collectivized property. The critical part refers to the
abscence of workers democracy (not abstract Democracy), adherence to "socialism
in one country," and moves that undermine the postcapitalist property forms
like dollarization. Pure and simple "opposition," and abstract and sectarian
characterization of the regime as "Stalinist" just like N. Korea, the USSR and
the PRC, is Farber's stock in trade. And that is on full view in the ISR
article. Trotskyists defend the gains of the Cuban Revolution, seek to solidify
them, and extend those gains to other anti-imperialist struggles as in
Venezuela. If one sees Cuba as state capitalist, or ruled by a new owning class
as in bureacratic collectivism (Farber accepts either characterization), why do
Marxists owe it any support at all? This is a question both for the ISO and
professor Farber.
Bob Montgomery




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]