Re: [Marxism] Re: The Nader Factor Revisited

["David Quarter" <davidquarter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Who wrote the garbage below Jay's comments?


From:                   "Pieinsky" <pieinsky@xxxxxxx>

> This is red-baiting at its worst, a throw back to the days of Joe McCarthy!
> Shame on you.  Stop this bullshit, if you want my vote.
> At least get your history straight:  As a Trotskyist, Peter Camejo never had
> anything to do with the pro-Soviet Communist Party.
>
> jay moore
> marshfield, vermont
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "We Helped Stop Bush" <stopbushnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pieinsky@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 5:29 AM
> Subject: The Nader Factor Revisited
>
>
> > News Release, July 12, 2004
> >
> > Please Post and Distribute
> >
> >      You received this email because you signed up at
> > www.WeHelpedStopBush.com or contacted one of our us. We believe we
> > share similar interests and want what is best for America.
> >
> >      To be delisted, and not receive further communications from us,
> > reply to uxor401@xxxxxxxxx and insert "Delist" in the Subject line.
> >
> > New Evidence of Ralph Nader's Poor Judgment
> >
> > Ralph Nader's choice of Peter Camejo as his vice presidential running
> > mate offers concrete evidence that Nader's last-minute run at the
> > presidency is wholly without merit, merely obstructionist, and serves
> > no positive purpose.
> >
> >      Like Nader, Peter Camejo expresses an interest in helping people
> > who need help. Like Nader, Mr. Camejo has demonstrated the courage to
> > champion unpopular, yet often important, causes. Like Nader, Camejo is
> > an intelligent and articulate debater.
> >
> >     But unlike Nader, Peter Camejo is a self-proclaimed revolutionary
> > Marxist, a man who favors communist values, a man who has spent much
> > of his life advocating the Communist Party line, including the
> > overthrow of our government. Just punch Peter Camejo into Google and
> > you will see some of Camejo's Marxist rants.
> >
> >       One such rant appears at
> > www.angelfire.com/pr/red/revolution/contents/htm. It is a speech given
> > by Mr. Camejo when he was running for president as the head of the
> > Socialist Workers Party. The speech is entitled "How to Make a
> > Revolution in the US." In part, Mr. Camejo says, "Are we going to
> > build a revolutionary socialist vanguard that can lead a mass movement
> > to overthrow the system? The answer is yes, we are going to do it."
> >
> >      Perhaps Nader and Camejo think the time is ripe for that socialist
> > revolution. If not, perhaps they think America is so weakened by Bush
> > neo-con atrocities that they can weaken her even further by working
> > with the Republican Party against the candidacy of John Kerry.
> > Numerous press reports indicate that Republicans are funding Nader.
> > That Republicans would sink so low is but one more example of just how
> > revolting Bush/Rove-led Republicans are.
> >
> >      Peter Cameo, the son of one of Venezuela's wealthiest families,
> > has not told us why he turned to communism, or if he has abandoned his
> > desire to overthrow our government. But having a self-professed
> > Marxist zealot but a heartbeat from the presidency is not feasible.
> > Mr. Nader's selection of Mr. Camejo as his running mate shows
> > inordinate disdain for the sensibilities of the vast majority of
> > Americans, and for our national security.
> >
> >      Perhaps, only Peter Camejo enough has enough skill and
> > revolutionary fervor to run with Nader. Perhaps Nader is not familiar
> > with Camejo's anti-democratic/pro-communist values. Even the Green
> > Party seems to have rejected Ralph Nader. In any case, Nader's VP
> > choice is ample proof of Nader's poor judgment and his inability to
> > lead a nation that detests communism.
> >
> >       # # # # #


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism