Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] An afterword on the new imperialism by David Harvey
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PEN-L list <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] An afterword on the new imperialism by David Harvey
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:59:51 -0400
- Cc:
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
David Harvey
THE NEW IMPERIALISM
Afterword to Foreign Language Editions
(clip)
The question of the exact state of global oil supplies and reserves
remains as murky as ever. In my initial text, I stated, for example,
that oil reserves in Canada are running down. If, however, the
difficult-to-extract oil in the tar sands is included then Canada’s oil
reserves are very substantial. Russia has stepped into the world oil
market in a very big way in the last year or so (and is beginning to
acquire the status of an oil-exporting economy with all the attendant
dangers and difficulties that attach thereto). And the sudden interest
of the Bush Administration for military bases in Africa (particularly
West Africa and Angola) almost certainly has far more to do with the
substantial oil reserves there than with the ritual excuse of the war
against terrorism or the ostensible embrace of humanitarian concerns and
the need to confront the AIDS epidemic. As a footnote we now know from
recently released British intelligence records that the US was prepared
to occupy the oilfields of Saudi Arabia. Kuwait and Abu Dhabi in the
crisis of 1973. The inference that the reason the Saudis agreed to
recycle petrodollars through US banks was to stave off such a threat
looks entirely plausible. With respect to the oil situation more
generally, the best that anyone can do is to recognize the volatility of
the oil picture but also accept that no matter what happens the Middle
East is a crucial region in relation to the global economy and that the
US presence in the region, which has been steadily escalating since
1945, will not diminish in the near future. Whoever wins the next US
presidential election is unlikely to reverse the US drive to control the
region and its oil reserves.
full:
<http://www.colorado.edu/geography/dart/resources/harvey_imperialism_afterward.htm>
--
Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- RE: [Marxism] SWP and Hired Petitioners, (continued)
- [Marxism] Kerry, Raytheon, and the "Active Denial System",
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 12 Jun 2004, 15:51 GMT
- [Marxism] Iraq: Another quisling bites the dust...,
David Quarter Sat 12 Jun 2004, 14:18 GMT
- [Marxism] An afterword on the new imperialism by David Harvey,
Louis Proyect Sat 12 Jun 2004, 14:01 GMT
- [Marxism] Growth of the productive forces and qualification of labour-power in the United States,
Jurriaan Bendien Sat 12 Jun 2004, 13:47 GMT
- [Marxism] Churchill for dummies,
Louis Proyect Sat 12 Jun 2004, 13:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]