[Marxism] Letter to the Nation from Greg Bates

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

Counterpunch, February 17, 2004

Nader Attack a New Low Point
An Open Letter to The Nation
By GREG BATES

In telling Ralph Nader not to run for president, your fretting over
"tangible costs" that "may" be imposed on interest groups he champions
is both your letter's strongest point and no reason to write it. Arguing
against the threat of too much too fast is an ancient and dishonorable
tradition that ignores the space for change created by those who rock
the boat.

Long ago, the anti-slavery abolitionist movement was told it threatened
the greater cause of freedom. In the 1960s, card-burning draft dodgers
threatened to antagonize reasonable debate on the Vietnam War. Though no
one knew it at the time, these and other positions turned out to be
essential to their struggles. Continuing this liberal tradition, your
frantic worry that Ralph's run could create "risks, antagonism and
contortions" coupled with the hackneyed invocation to desist "for the
good of the country," represents a low point in the history of your
magazine.

You yourself demolish the argument that there are risks by citing polls
showing Ralph would garner far fewer votes than in his 2000 bid because
Democrats and Greens are focusing on ousting Bush. The dynamic actually
goes back to 2000 when many Nader sympathizers, realizing the election
would be close, switched in the final days to vote for Al Gore. This
successful attempt to save Gore from his own bungling campaign was then
dashed by Gore himself, who blew the final phase by failing to demand
that Florida do a state-wide recount. Progressives are united: never again.

But if Ralph's minuscule impact is so obvious, why not let him have his fun?

A run by Ralph does entail real risk, however. The Democratic effort to
retake the White House could collapse due to the personal vagaries of
the nominee, vicious Bush attacks, and the likely return of jobs to an
already recovering economy. Few incumbent presidents have lost
re-election on the heels of brightening economic times, even if it's
clear the tab for purchasing economic vigor will later come due. As
Democrats warm over the rhetoric that it's the economy, stupid, they are
likely to get burned.

Ralph's risk to the Democrats then, is this. Where once voters didn't
want to waste a ballot on him in the close race of 2000, they might
today, in the event of a commanding Bush lead, wish to avoid wasting it
on the Democratic nominee. If there's no strategy in it, why vote
against your principles for a hopeless Democrat who, to cite just two
similarities to Bush, doesn't favor gay marriages and favors keeping
troops in Iraq? Especially when you could vote with integrity for the
one person who's actually worthy of the job?

No candidate has chalked up the nearly half a century of public service
that Ralph has. A solid showing by Ralph risks driving a stake in the
Democratic strategy of mimicking the Republican platform. No doubt
striking fear in the hearts of many liberals, it could also be the best
chance in the long run to put a sinking ship on a more just keel.

Greg Bates is publisher of Common Courage Press. He can be reached at:
gbates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--

The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org



_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism