Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Kirchner



From the Workers Party of Argentina, one of the largest left groups there. I figure this would balance a bit the article forwarded by Louis on the Kirshner gov't.

--David Walters

PO 835 - 29/1/2004

EDITORIAL THE GOVERNMENT'S "SOCIAL PLAN" WORKER-PIQUETERA RESPONSE

CHRISTIAN RATH The government has announced that the rise in employment allowed them to cancel 120,000 Heads of Households Plan subsidies during the year (December 2002-3). Those now "formally" employed, according to the report, supposedly form part of the 750,000 jobs created in the course of the last year, according to INDEC (La Nación, 27 Dec '03). "Formally" employed? If the data provided by INDEC [government statistics institute] is contrasted with that declared by AFIP [Internal Revenue] "the figures fall notably, during the same period there was only registered a rise of 114,000 jobs" (ídem). On the other hand, "the ANSES [official government reporting body] data does not really match that conclusion" (Infobae, 19 Dec 03). The key to such a difference is that six out of seven new "jobs" come under the heading of "junk" jobs, unofficial, casual and flexibilized (including jobs having few working hours). The Centro de Estudios Nueva Mayoría (New Majority Center of Studies) remarks that during the last decade there was a fall in the unemployment rate between 1995 and 1998, but "that drop in the rate did not come as a result of a rise in the number of jobs registered, at that time the same thing was happening as in this stage of job market recovery" (La Nación, 27 Dec 03). In both cases, the statistics include the "junk" jobs, of an "odd jobs" nature, under the heading of "employed", and does the same with the beneficiaries of the Heads of Households plan. The new methodology of the INDEC revealed the reality in the form of an unemployment rate substantially worse than what has been reported in recent times.

The 16. 3 per cent (third quarter of 2003) signifies 2. 6 million unemployed, 500,000 more than those denounced according to the old methodology. If the beneficiaries of the social plans who do "work fare" in return for their stipends, the net unemployment is of the order of 3. 5 million people (22 per cent). Since under employment -- people who work few hours -- is also undervalued, on the whole we have a universe of more than seven million workers affected. The plans are not cancelled because of a rise in jobsEven accepting for the sake of argument the cancellation of 120,000 Heads of Households plans due to their beneficiaries having entered, not "formal," but rather "junk" employment, since Kirchner took office three hundred thousand plans have been cancelled, two hundred thousand Heads of Household and one hundred thousand provincial plans (65,000 in the Province of Buenos Aires, ten per cent of those benefiting in the district). A part of this decrease corresponds to a furious policy of purging the rosters being led by the Ministry of Social Development (Ministerio de Desarrollo Social): "The President's sister has been able to establish a complex data base where information from various ministries is cross indexed, from the ANSES and from the councils of consultation," with the aim of controlling "welfare plans throughout the country" (La Nación, 21 Dec 03).

Another part of the decrease correspond to the "productive enterprises. "On the eve of the new year, the bishop of La Rioja stated "the woman of the house should receive an unemployment subsidy and stay home to be with the children and take care of them," without any "work fare" (La Nación, 29 Nov 03). The man of the cloth understands the role of the woman in the piqueteros movement and proposes that history be turned back. Antonio Cafiero joined the bishop alleging that the Heads of Households plan "was created for families to have enough income so as to be able to feed their children inside their own home;" he rejected work fare because "it amounts to considering that the bringing up of their own children is not a task as socially useful as digging ditches, sweeping the plaza or cleaning the streets. "The master beam running through all these assertions is to disarm the piqueteros movement, make the woman go back to her home in ruins and to dissolve the community kitchen as a center of organization. The debate reveals that the government and the capitalists hold as a certainty something which the Minister of the Interior, Aníbal Fernández, stated in brutal fashion: "The piqueteros have got to disappear. "The trap of the productive projectsA considerable portion of the plans that have been cancelled during the past six months correspond to the productive projects. In the last fifteen days, as a reaction to the piqueteros Plaza de Mayo [December 26 march and rally, see article] the government led a real marathon of initiatives.

It announced the launching of a plan for collective enterprises, formed by a minimum of three beneficiaries of the Heads of Households Plans and with a state subsidy of a maximum of 15,000 pesos; it concluded a National Competition of Projects for the Financing of Micro-enterprises, part of the "Let's get to work" plan; and approved a community infrastructure plan "aimed at waterworks for drinking water, drainage, sewage, clinics, first aid stations, sidewalks, gutters," with loans to be granted by the municipalities and manpower provided by Heads of Households. The projects remunerate the workers with 150 pesos, without social benefits, pension, accident insurance, without fixed working hours or union contract, replacing permanent city employees. What is more, this will be only for a fixed period, because "when the enterprises acquire a sustainable income we will have to see on a case by case basis and review the granting of the benefit" (La Nación, 7 Jan).

The government had to accept the reinsertion of the Heads of Households plans among workers involved in construction (among other reasons, due to the mobilization of the Bloque Piquetero Nacional -- National Piqueteros Bloc) but would not retreat with the rest. The "productive projects" have an advantage: "they imply the initial awarding of tools or lump monetary sums, but often also the condition that the beneficiary give up the plan" (Clarín, 4/1). "The great danger is for the territorial movement to unite with the trade union movement"The _expression corresponds to a high-ranking official in the national government. The Bloque Piquetero Nacional and the Asamblea Nacional de Trabajadores (ANT - National Assembly of Workers) have approved the fight for the annulment of the labor reform "purchased" in the Senate. They have put into motion a campaign for negotiating committees elected by the rank-and-file, for the banishment of labor flexibilisation, and for the establishment of a Job Agency to hire the unemployed on the basis of an emergency workday of six hours. The purpose is to open the way for a mass campaign with declarations signed in the workplaces, plenaries uniting the piqueteros movement with the new union activism and mobilization that places all the energy of the employed and unemployed workers movement behind the objective of annulling the ATM law and imposing legislation to protect the workers.

More texts in English from Partido Obrero - http://www. po. org. ar/english/

_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]