Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] We all agree the world is round: Immanuel Wallerstein on the WSF in the YaleGlobal writeup
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] We all agree the world is round: Immanuel Wallerstein on the WSF in the YaleGlobal writeup
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:28:02 -0500
- Cc: PEN-L list <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Immanuel Wallerstein wrote:
When the Forum moved from Brazil to India, the Indian organizing committee
dropped the provision about parties. Still, the proscription against
violence led to a split among the Indians. A small Maoist movement organized
a counter-Forum, called Mumbai Resistance-2004, on grounds across the road
from the WSF. And they denounced the WSF as a combination of Trotskyites,
Social-Democrats, reformist mass organizations, NGO's financed by
transnationals - in short, a stalking-horse for quietism and
counter-revolution. They specifically attacked the concept of the open forum
(merely a talk show, they said), the slogan (not "another world," but
socialism as the objective, they said), and the financing of the WSF (the
fact that some money came from the Ford Foundation).
It really amazes me to see Wallerstein setting himself up as some kind
of arbiter on these questions.
Logos 1.1 - Winter 2002, 61
Immanuel Wallerstein's Planet
by Robert Fitch
Just a couple of blocks south from where the legendary literary cafes of
the Boulevard St. Germaine de Pres intersect the ornate embassies that
line the Boulevard Raspail, stands a squat, dark gray, steel and glass
structure, with dozens of bicycles tethered at crazy angles across the
front entrance. It’s the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, built in 1970
by Fernand Braudel, France’s most revered modern historian, who led the
celebrated Annales School during its years of greatest influence. Enter
through the American-style revolving doors, take the elevator to the
fourth floor, and you are in the offices of Braudel’s most influential
disciple, the wildly controversial inventor of World Systems Theory, the
former Africanist turned global historian, Immanuel Wallerstein.
It’s a fresh spring day in March. The wild chamomile is already blooming
in the nearby Luxembourg gardens. And Wallerstein seems equally distant
from the Grand Concourse in the Bronx where he grew up; from the
semi-arctic winds still sweeping through his home base, the SUNY
Binghamton campus in upstate New York. And from the innumerable
controversies he’s stirred up by his efforts to replace the principal
actors of conventional historiography—nations, states, peoples, ethnic
groups, classes, cultures, civilizations—with a total concentration on
the “dynamics of the world system.”
Wallerstein has recently taken on a new job: President of the
International Sociological Association, having succeeded Enrique
Cardoso, who has since moved on to become the President of Brazil. After
being twice defeated for the Presidency of the American Sociological
Association, Wallerstein won the top position in the world organization
by canvassing the votes of third world sociologists. It’s from his Paris
office, now, that Wallerstein takes care of his new Presidential
responsibilities. As well as his nearly nonexistent duties at the
Maison. “The Maison is really a teaching institution. But I can do what
I want, I write the bill. If I want to do something I’ll lecture or hold
a seminar. If I don’t, I won’t. It’s basically relaxed.” Essentially,
the Maison provides an office and office support. And SUNY makes it all
possible by paying Wallerstein over $145,000 to teach one class a year
on two continents.
Nowadays, of course, the most highly prized scholars don’t exchange
lecturing labor for monthly wages; they loan academic institutions their
cultural capital and get back interest in the form of cash, perquisites
and freedom from lecturing. One way to estimate the market value of
Wallerstein’s cultural capital is to check the tables provided by the
most recent five year SSCI Citation Index – which serves as a kind of
S&P 500 for professorial stock. The more you’re cited, the higher your
value. At roughly 200 citations a column Michel Foucault leads all the
Cited with 22 columns; Jürgen Habermas follows with 20; and then Talcott
Parsons with 18. Among the living English-speaking social scientists,
anthropologist Clifford Geertz and Oxford’s Anthony Giddens both
happened to have 13. And so does Wallerstein. But no other living
American sociologist can match his total.
On the afternoon of my visit to the Maison, Wallerstein scans the
morning mail which happens to bring letters from France’s most famous
sociologists—Alain Touraine and Pierre Bourdieu—who invented the concept
of cultural capital. Touraine, it turns out, will be participating in a
twoday international conference in April, devoted to exploring the
themes of Wallerstein’s work. It’s being sponsored jointly by Le Monde,
L’Expansion, Le Nouvel Observateur and the Paribas Foundation (created
by France’s most powerful investment bank formerly known as the Banque
de Paris et des Pays bas). The sponsors bill him as Braudel’s successor.
“With his resolutely interdisciplinary scientific approach,” the
conference brochure reads, “we have invited him to interrogate the
recent past to be able to understand the present and the future.”
Speakers and commentators form an intellectual bouillabaisse of academic
disciplines, countries, and ideologies: from the Dakar-based Maoist,
Samir Amin, the author of Eurocentrism to the Wall Street based
billionaire currency speculator George Soros. It was The Modern World
System that catapulted him to a pre-eminent status among American
sociologists. At the time, in 1974, Andre Gunder Frank, the dean of
Latin American dependistas, briskly lifted aside the velvet ropes to
permit Wallerstein’s fast-track entry into the pantheon of modern
historiography, declaring The Modern World System an “instant classic.”
The next year, The Modern World System won sociology’s highest award,
the Pitriam Sorokin Prize. The review in Contemporary Sociology, written
by a former student, Michael Hechter, proclaimed it “the most important
theoretical statement about development since the time of Max Weber.”
full: http://www.logosjournal.com/winter_2002.pdf
--
The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] We all agree the world is round - reply to Louis on Wallerstein,
Jurriaan Bendien Mon 02 Feb 2004, 22:08 GMT
- [Marxism] FW: Veterans Lose Overtime Pay Under Bush Scheme,
Craven, Jim Mon 02 Feb 2004, 21:05 GMT
- [Marxism] We all agree the world is round: Immanuel Wallerstein on the WSF in the YaleGlobal writeup,
Jurriaan Bendien Mon 02 Feb 2004, 20:01 GMT
- [Marxism] June 2003 WSJ article on Venezuela,
Walter Lippmann Mon 02 Feb 2004, 18:40 GMT
- [Marxism] Abdul Rahman Munif,
Louis Proyect Mon 02 Feb 2004, 18:25 GMT
- [Marxism] Howard Dean,
Louis Proyect Mon 02 Feb 2004, 18:18 GMT
- [Marxism] WSJ: "For Aging Castro, Chavez Emerges as a Vital Crutch",
Walter Lippmann Mon 02 Feb 2004, 17:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]