[Marxism] Demoblicans or Republic Rats?

["Nestor Gorojovsky" <nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lou Pr. stated:

"The Democratic Party is suited for piecemeal reforms on the local 
level, while participating in crimes against humanity on the global 
level."

That is, the Dems are the _actual_ imperialists in the sense of Cecil 
Rhodes ("Imperialism is a matter of stomach. If we don't turn 
imperialists, we shall have to face civil war at home").

Last of all people in this world to meddle into the intense divisions 
that the next elections will bring to the American radical Left.

But I believe this: both Reps and Dems will follow more or less the 
same policies abroad. You will not vote US out of Iraq by voting 
Clark.  

What I would rather try to do is to think of the best way in which 
the popular forces can obtain a better position, for future battles, 
within the belly of the Beast.  In the end, the question is whether 
the relatively more popular basis of the Dems will force them to lead 
a bourgeois retreat from the entrenched positions they have acquired 
under the Reps.  And if so, whether this can be useful for the 
movement or not. 

Anyway, we shall fight against either Dems or Reps. But I would like 
to know what would be Fidel's ideas on this.

Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
"Sí, una sola debe ser la patria de los sudamericanos".
Simón Bolívar al gobierno secesionista y disgregador de 
Buenos Aires, 1822
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 



_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism