[Marxism] The myth of the new anti-Semitism

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nation Magazine,
Posted January 15, 2004

The Myth of the New Anti-Semitism
by Brian Klug

In 1879 the German journalist Wilhelm Marr, a former socialist and
anarchist, founded an organization that was novel in two ways. It was the
first political party based on a platform of hostility to Jews. And it
introduced the world to a new word: "anti-Semite."

Marr was an atheist, and the Antisemiten-Liga (League of Anti-Semites) was
hostile to Jews on the secular grounds that they are an alien "race."
However, his account of "Semitism" was not essentially different from the
demonic conception of the Jew that had existed in Christian Europe for
centuries. It boiled down to this: Jews are a people apart from the rest of
humanity. They are the enemy. Wherever they go, they form a state within a
state. Conspiring in secret, they work together to promote their own
collective advantage at the expense of the nations or societies in whose
midst they dwell and on whom they prey. Cunning and manipulative, they
possess uncanny powers that enable them, despite their small numbers, to
achieve their ends. The term "antiSemitism" has come to refer to this
discourse, or variations on the themes it contains, because the same
rhetoric persists whether Jewish identity is seen as religious, racial,
national or ethnic. Sometimes this discourse is explicit; at other times it
is the subtext of attacks on Jews. Anti-Semitism, thus defined, is not new.

But a spate of recent articles and books assert the rise of a "new
anti-Semitism." This is the thrust of "Graffiti on History's Walls" by
Mortimer Zuckerman, the cover story of the November 3, 2003, issue of U.S.
News & World Report. In December New York magazine ran a similarly
sensationalist cover story, titled "The Return of Anti-Semitism," which
spoke of "a groundswell of hate" against Jews and suggested that Jew-hatred
was now "politically correct" in Europe. At least three books recently
published in English make the same claim: Never Again? by Abraham Foxman,
national director of the Anti-Defamation League; The New Anti-Semitism by
feminist Phyllis Chesler; and The Case for Israel by Harvard law professor
Alan Dershowitz. Most of the contributors to A New Antisemitism?, edited by
Paul Iganski and Barry Kosmin, take a similar view, with varying degrees of
emphasis.

As the words "threat" and "crisis" in the subtitles of the books by Foxman
and Chesler indicate, the "new anti-Semitism" is generally seen, by those
who proclaim its existence, as a clear and present danger. Foxman believes
that a "frightening coalition of anti-Jewish sentiment is forming on a
global scale." Chesler goes even further: "Let me be clear: the war against
the Jews is being waged on many fronts--militarily, politically,
economically, and through propaganda--and on all continents." She even
perceives a wider threat to Western civilization itself: "Who or what can
loosen the madness that has gripped the world and that threatens to
annihilate the Jews and the West?"

There is certainly reason to be concerned about a climate of hostility to
Jews, including vicious physical attacks. On one Saturday this past
November, for example, two synagogues in Istanbul were truck-bombed during
Sabbath services, while an Orthodox Jewish school in a Paris suburb was
largely destroyed by arson. Some researchers report a 60 percent worldwide
increase in the number of assaults on Jews (or persons perceived to be
Jewish) in 2002, compared with the previous year. At the same time,
something is rotten in the state of public discourse. Anti-Jewish slogans
and graphics have appeared on marches opposing the invasion of Iraq. Jewish
conspiracy theories have been revived, such as the widely circulated "urban
legend" that Jews were warned in advance to stay away from the World Trade
Center in New York on September 11, 2001. And recently, certain public
figures on both the right and the left have made negative generalizations
about Jews and "Jewish influence."

The authors under review tend to lump all these facts together, along with
a wealth of evidence for what they see as an explosion of bias against
Israel: in the media, in the United Nations, on college campuses and
elsewhere. They conclude that there is a single unified phenomenon, a "new
antiSemitism." However, while the facts give cause for serious concern, the
idea that they add up to a new kind of anti-Semitism is confused. Moreover,
this confusion, combined with a McCarthyite tendency to see anti-Semites
under every bed, arguably contributes to the climate of hostility toward
Jews. The result is to make matters worse for the very people these authors
mean to defend.

The claim that I am criticizing is not that there is a new outbreak of
"old" antiSemitism but that there is an outbreak of anti-Semitism of a new
kind. Thus the case in support of this claim is not merely cumulative: It
does not consist simply in piling up one example after another. There is an
organizing principle, a central idea that holds the case together. It is
only in terms of this idea that many of the examples cited in the
literature count as evidence of antiSemitism. Without this central idea,
the case that is made with their help falls apart. So the question is this:
What puts the "new" into "new anti-Semitism"?

full: http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040202&s=klug

Louis Proyect
Marxism list: www.marxmail.org


_______________________________________________
Marxism mailing list
Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism