Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Re: Wesley Clark: Friend or Foe?
- To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Marxism] Re: Wesley Clark: Friend or Foe?
- From: Craig Brozefsky <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:55:52 -0600
- Cc:
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"OpenSentence Type Foundry" <typefoundry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Frankly, military fatigues probably give you cancer; war is about
> death, and death on the cheap in all kinds of ways. I'm not sure
> depleted uranium's the greatest environmental-exposure risk you can
> face, because I doubt it very much.
Please explain this to the people of Afghanistan and Yugoslavia who
face a few thousand years of depleted uranium contamination of their
land, air, and water. I'm sure they'll also appreciate your help
explaining why their still-birth and birth-defect rates have increased
drastically. Water, land, air, all poisoned, with significants amount
of research backing that up. No "soldiers truth" will erase that, not
in tens of thousands of years.
> You've got to pick *your* battles.
Falsifying history and minimizing the deadly effects of a weapon of
mass destruction is not picking a battle. Attempting to step around
inconvenient facts about someone who you find yourslf compelled to
vote for, is not picking a battle. Voting for a war criminal is not
picking a battle. It is admitting defeat and taking the easy way out,
especially when there are people in the race, and fighting hard to
stay in it, other than war criminals, and not from the Democratic
party. If electoral politics is so hopeless that we have to lie to
ourselves, than it should be abandoned altogether. I don't think it
is, and I have seen people fighting hard on various levels to express
their social power thru elections. It takes hard work, it takes
setting aside months and months of your weekends, knocking on doors,
talking to people, learning to listen, listening to learn.
In the US we need to recognize that cynical capitulation within the
two party system, regardless of the twisted rational and
"real-politik" justifying it, is a DEAD END! That is the real
"soldiers truth" on the battlefield we find ourselves on.
--
Sincerely, Craig Brozefsky <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
No war! No racist scapegoating! No attacks on civil liberties!
Chicago Coalition Against War & Racism: www.chicagoantiwar.org
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Re:Hu's on First - belated reply I,
dmschanoes Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:23 GMT
- [Marxism] weird bounce messages,
Les Schaffer Fri 21 Nov 2003, 22:00 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: Fog of War,
Peter McLaren Fri 21 Nov 2003, 20:33 GMT
- [Marxism] RE: Lee Harvey Oswald,
Mark Lause Fri 21 Nov 2003, 20:23 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: Wesley Clark: Friend or Foe?,
Craig Brozefsky Fri 21 Nov 2003, 20:05 GMT
- [Marxism] The Civil War's Last Campaign,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 21 Nov 2003, 20:01 GMT
- [Marxism] Two interesting quotes from the events in Britain,
Eli Stephens Fri 21 Nov 2003, 19:54 GMT
- [Marxism] Test,
Hans Ehrbar Fri 21 Nov 2003, 19:32 GMT
- [Marxism] Chomsky at Columbia,
Derek Seidman Fri 21 Nov 2003, 19:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]