Re: marxism-digest V1 #6547

["OpenSentence Type Foundry" <typefoundry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> El Viernes 31 de Octubre de 2003 a las 19:56,
> OpenSentence Type Foundry dijo sobre Negri's responsibilities que: 
>
> > Please explain this concept of "political responsibility" extending beyond
> > one's legal responsibilities as a person and falling short of one's
> > responsibilities as a member of an anti-Maoist political faction.  
>
> Really need an explanation? 
>
> Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
> nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Yes.  I mentioned that Eisenhower was responsible for Lumumba's death on 
Usenet today, but he was President (it was the last major act of his 
administration, occurring three days before Kennedy's inauguration).  But 
the concept of "political responsibility" applying to person neither as an 
individual (the case covered by the other connection between Negri and a 
left terrorist) nor as a member of an NGO with no legal authority (Autonomia 
"did things" in the persons of its members, nothing else) seems incoherent, 
a brush to tar someone with.  And the aforementioned Spinozist barbecue chef 
would understand this process, but actually raise a question about the 
limitation of sacredness to *human* flesh. 


~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.