Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: (Spanish) The actual words by Toni Negri and his interviewer on Iraq
- To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (Spanish) The actual words by Toni Negri and his interviewer on Iraq
- From: "Einde O'Callaghan" <einde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:17:56 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
Louis Proyect wrote:
Nestor Gorojovsky wrote:
Negri: - Porque, por el momento, no se trata de una administración
colonial, sino de un proceso clásico de "nation building"
(construcción de nación). Y por ende se trata de una transformación de
sentido democrático. Ese es el pretexto de Estados Unidos. Es una
ocupación militar que derribó un régimen, pero después el problema es
"nation building", o sea un intento de transición, no de
colonización. Sería como decir que es colonizador el hecho de pasar
de la dictadura a la democracia en Hungría o Checoslovaquia. No hay
una actitud de ese tipo en la administración estadounidense. Estos
estadounidenses quieren parecer más malos de lo que son.
I don't think this quite adds up to an endorsement of the occupation. It
is instead a kind of mandarin intellectualization of the issues, a
clever playing with the question of whether the USA is like Victorian
England.
I don't speak Spanish, but this Babelfish translation (despite
inadequacies) seems pretty conclusive to me:
Oscar Raul Cardoso: - there are characteristics of the no situation that
retrotraen us to the imperialism of century 19: military occupation, an
authority created by the metropolis and an appropriation of natural
resources (petroleum) and new assigned businesses arbitrarily to
companies of that metropolis?
Negri: - All those affirmations are false, of the first a the last one.
O.R.C.: - Because '?
Negri: - Because, at the moment, one is not a colonial administration,
but of a classic process of "nation building" (construction of nation).
And therefore one is a transformation of democratic sense. That is the
pretext of the United States. It is a military occupation that
demolished a regime, but later the problem is "nation building", that is
an attempt of transition, not of colonization. It would be like saying
that the fact to happen of the dictatorship is colonizador to the
democracy in Hungary or Czechoslovakia. There is no an attitude of that
type in the American administration. These Americans want to seem worse
of which they are.
Einde O'Callaghan
~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]