Surprise-surprise, imperialism still exists...

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

UN says war in Congo is fuelled by foreign firms
By David Usborne in New York
The Independent, 31 October 2003

A panel of experts renewed its warning to the United Nations yesterday
that the illegal exploitation of precious minerals in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) is continuing to fuel conflict in the country.

The Security Council was due last night to discuss a fourth and possibly
final report from the panel that has been investigating the parts played
by scores of foreign and African-based companies in helping, wittingly
or otherwise, to perpetuate the war that has already cost the lives of
more than 2.5 million people.

"Illegal exploitation remains one of the main sources of funding for
groups involved in perpetuating the conflict," the panel said. It urged
the international community to block the flow of arms to those groups
and continue to put pressure on companies which operate in the Congo to
abide by international guidelines of good conduct.

"The flow of arms," the report says, "exploitation and the continuation
of the conflict are inextricably linked. Breaking that cycle will be key
to ending both the conflict and the illegal exploitation of natural
resources."

The minerals involved include diamonds, cobalt and also the lesser-known
coltan, which is used in the manufacture of electronics, such as mobile
phones.

In its work over three years, the panel has named 157 companies and
individuals that warranted investigation into their activities in Congo.
Of those parties, which were first identified in an earlier report last
year, 119 have given responses to questions posed by the panel, the
report said.

It adds, however, that 18 companies, including some well-known
international operators, either rejected any suggestion that their
activities in Congo were questionable or refused to accept that they had
any responsibility for the continuing violence.

Human rights organisations are pressing the Security Council to seek
prosecutions by western governments of some of the companies identified.
The plea was made again by a group of organisations, including Oxfam and
Human Rights Watch, which issued a joint statement in New York.

The Council "can no longer ignore clear evidence linking the
exploitation of resources to the war in the Congo," the group said. "It
must insist that member states hold the companies and individuals
involved to account, including companies based in Western countries.
Business must demonstrate its commitment to change the way it operates
in conflict situations."

Diplomats said the Council was unlikely to press for any prosecutions,
however. The UN, which has deployed 10,000 peacekeepers in the country,
is anxious not to destabilise the peace process now under way and the
progress of the transitional government installed earlier this year.

In its annexes, the report sorts the companies into different categories
depending on how far their respective cases have been resolved, and nine
UK companies are listed as requiring no further investigation. However,
four UK-based firms are included in a third category of "unresolved"
cases which have been "referred for updating or further investigation".
Those companies are De Beers, the giant diamond conglomerate, Das Air,
Avient Air and Oryx Natural Resources.

Files on these companies have been passed to the UK Government.

A spokesman for De Beers, in a statement to the BBC, defended the firm's
conduct. "De Beers is the only company that was on the list - on the
original list in fact - that had called for sanctions to be applied to
those diamond areas within the [DRC] that were feeding rebels there and
the conflict," he said.

Controversy surrounds a decision by senior UN officials to keep one
section of the report sealed.

The section deals with information gathered by the panel on senior
government and military figures in Congo and neighbouring countries
drawn into the war.

--

The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org



~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.