Re: Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial)

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial)
From: Chris Brady <cdbrady@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:03:07 -0800

This conference committee move ought to be interesting.
Should raise a ruckus, at least.
What a corrupt lot these people are.

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

Prev by Date: Re: Havana Club (WSJ editorial)
Next by Date: We Urgently Need To Preserve the Dreams of Che
Previous by thread: Re: Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial)
Next by thread: Re: Havana Club (WSJ editorial)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Havana Club (WSJ editorial), Chris Brady Tue 28 Oct 2003, 07:57 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Havana Club (WSJ editorial), Walter Lippmann Tue 28 Oct 2003, 14:34 GMT
- Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial), Walter Lippmann Tue 28 Oct 2003, 06:11 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial), Eli Stephens Tue 28 Oct 2003, 06:21 GMT
  - Re: Cuba's travel ban (Financial Times editorial), Chris Brady Tue 28 Oct 2003, 08:01 GMT
- Roger Garaudy's answer to Norman Geras - reply to Louis, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 28 Oct 2003, 06:01 GMT
- 47% of Israelis Believe that the U.S. Favors Israel Too Much, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 28 Oct 2003, 05:33 GMT
  - Re: 47% of Israelis Believe that the U.S. Favors Israel Too Much, Macdonald Stainsby Tue 28 Oct 2003, 08:50 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: 47% of Israelis Believe that the U.S. Favors Israel Too Much, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 28 Oct 2003, 17:47 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]