Re: Short response to Armand

["LouPaulsen" <LouPaulsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Armand Diego" <causebellum@xxxxxxxxx>

> It's time for balance-sheets, my friend,  and in the
> most significant battle wage at this moment, in this
> country, these organizations [including WWP] showed their true
> sectarian and reformist colors, their political and
> theoretical confusion.  The criticisms are accurate
> and timely.

Sectarian AND reformist.  Are we rabid sectarians AND rabid reformists?

> I will cut this short, I have to work on some more
> votes for Yes on the Recall and for Peter Camejo.
> Five days left. Now that you already vote for the
> Democrats I can't waaste more time convincing you of
> anything.

Oh, BOSH, Armand.  You say that Eli's vote against the recall is a 'vote for
the Democrats', regardless of his intentions and principles, but I suppose
you would object if someone said that your campaign for the recall is a bloc
with the Republicans and a 'vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger', regardless of
YOUR intentions and principles.  That's the whole damn trouble with the
recall vote: you are either in a bloc with Davis or a bloc with
Schwarzenegger no matter what the hell you do.  Come to think of it it's
just like the fight over impeaching Clinton.  Would 'Convict Clinton!  Make
Camejo the President!' have been a good mass line, do you think?

The Sparts have been calling us pimps of the Democrats for 30 years now.  I
doubt if you can come up with any invective that they haven't used.  We're
used to it.  Yawn.

Lou Paulsen


~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.