Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
From: clyder@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:01:39 +0100
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs

continued:
this of course is the mechanism by which a standard
fission device causes a large explosion.

~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

References:
- Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
  - From: Mike Friedman
- Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
  - From: Les Schaffer

Prev by Date: Arthur Kinoy
Next by Date: Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
Previous by thread: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
Next by thread: Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: On a method of discussion that leaves ALL the questions unanswered, (continued)
  - Re: On a method of discussion that leaves ALL the questions unanswered, Waistline2 Tue 30 Sep 2003, 01:48 GMT
- Was Lenin so blind as to worker's aristocracy?, Nestor Gorojovsky Mon 29 Sep 2003, 14:44 GMT
- Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, Mike Friedman Mon 29 Sep 2003, 14:37 GMT
  - Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, Les Schaffer Mon 29 Sep 2003, 15:48 GMT
    - Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, clyder Mon 29 Sep 2003, 21:02 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, clyder Mon 29 Sep 2003, 21:13 GMT
    - Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, Les Schaffer Mon 29 Sep 2003, 22:51 GMT
  - Re: Superbomb Ignites Science Dispute, Paul Cockshott Wed 01 Oct 2003, 21:10 GMT
- Capitalism, slavery and the Brenner thesis part 4, Louis Proyect Mon 29 Sep 2003, 14:28 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]