RE: What is Workers World's opinion of Camejo?

[Adam Levenstein <cleon42@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- "Jose G. Perez" <jgperez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, it seems to me quite rabidly sectarian to back Weber instead of
> Camejo since Camejo has shown himself to be a much more effective
> campaigner and succeeded in forcing even the national media to give
> him
> (some) coverage. For that matter, why does the California P&F party
> still exist? I would've thought people would pool efforts with the
> Greens.

WWP has had good relations with P&F for a while now. If memory serves,
both times Monica Moorehead ran for president she got the endorsement
of P&F.

Regarding the "rabidly sectarian" bit--Jose, not everyone agrees that
the Peter Camejo campaign is the Great Way Forward for socialists. WWP
is a socialist organization, and for some inexplicable reason chose to
support a socialist candidate (Peter may well be a socialist, but as
we've all established ad nauseum, he is NOT running a socialist
campaign). Is this the best way? Dunno. My jury's still out, as my past
posts on Camejo can attest. But "rabidly sectarian?" Hardly.

Adam

=====
-----------------------------------------------------------
Adam Levenstein                          cleon42@xxxxxxxxx
ICQ: 17125158

Linus Torvalds on SCO's anti-Linux campaign:
"They are smoking crack."

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com