RE: There are no terrorists in iraq except for the USuk Axis soldiers

[Ben Pincas <benpincas@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The resistance in WWII was mainly, dare I say, marxist?

Neither the guerillas in france, Italy, greece, nor Tito in Yugoslavia, 
objected to a bit of imperial aid - just as Mao did not object to Chiang-Kai 
Shek (spelling?).

I think this tactic is discussed by lenin, trotsky and probably Mao - indeed it 
is mentioned by Marx when referring to tacts to be used when working together 
with bourgeoise reformists.

I know you wish references, so i will have to search, but i believe that you 
are already aware of this approach.

My post was cross posted to several lists and I mentioned specifically De 
Gaulle and Churchill for precisely those posters who may not be Marxist, but 
just a bit "progressive" and who may have needed a bit of legitimation from 
people as right-wing as Bush and Rumsfeld in order to make the brave step of 
seeing the "terrorists" in the same light as some on THIS list see U.S. 
soldiers.

...thinking as i go along...

Indeed I think the tactic of conniving with reactionaries has something to do 
with continuing the revolution after the "patriotic" war has been won - just as 
Mao did.

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Jose G. Perez wrote:

> To Ben Pincas
>
> I note your support for anglo-french imperialism in the second world
> war, but what do you accusations of social patriotism have to do with
> THIS list?
>
> José
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> MSN Messenger, nouvelle version ! Personnalisez vos messages, jouez en
> ligne et communiquez en temps réel par vidéo! http://ifrance.com/_reloc/m
>
_____________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger, nouvelle version ! Personnalisez vos messages, jouez en
ligne et communiquez en temps réel par vidéo! http://ifrance.com/_reloc/m