Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba
OK, I lied, Again.
Hopefully this will be last...
I do not mean to be patronizing, and as many people will
attest, NOTHING I do is covert.
So let me make it plain. Your reasoning about the ultimate
good and first priority is exactly identical to the explanation
use by the US military for its actions in the village of Ben Tre,
Vietnam.
"In order to save the village, we had to destroy it."
Ultimately, you see, it was in the villagers' best interests
to be dead as the first priority was to secure the village
from the NLF.
So when people start sacficing the welfare of a child, when
people do from the left what the Miami group did from the
right, i.e. make a child a politcal cudgel, and justify that
by the immediate or greater good of an abstraction called
a "party or "all future children," then there really is no
point to further discussion.
- Thread context:
- RE: Re: SWP policy on Cuba, (continued)
- RE: Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
David McDonald Thu 14 Aug 2003, 18:22 GMT
- Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
DMS Thu 14 Aug 2003, 18:21 GMT
- Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
DMS Thu 14 Aug 2003, 18:57 GMT
- Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
DMS Thu 14 Aug 2003, 19:32 GMT
- RE: SWP policy on Cuba,
Craven, Jim Thu 14 Aug 2003, 20:00 GMT
- Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
paul illich Sat 16 Aug 2003, 01:50 GMT
- Note to Laura,
David Walters Thu 14 Aug 2003, 17:17 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]