Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba
I sense a storm brewing about this and far be it from
me to pour oil on troubled waters, but there really is
an issue that Jose and Walter address, at least paritally,
and the SWP, and Laura after it, ignores. And that is simply
What was in the best interest of the child? We are after
all dealing with a young boy who has seen his mother die
and is not being paraded in front of cameras like a
prisoner of war.
So what was in the best interest of the child? And if
the answer is "to be reunited with his father," then
that's that, and criticism of the US should center
on allowing the Miami group to take control of the child
in the first place.
dms
- Thread context:
- RE: (fwd from David Walters) SWP policy, as I recall it, on going south for the civil rights movement, (continued)
- Alex Cockburn on Ted Honderich,
Jim Farmelant Thu 14 Aug 2003, 19:27 GMT
- FW: [ndn-aim] ICT: Inferior Blackfeet housing under fire,
Craven, Jim Thu 14 Aug 2003, 19:06 GMT
- The truth behind those mad scientist stories,
e . c . apling Thu 14 Aug 2003, 18:21 GMT
- Re: Re: SWP policy on Cuba,
DMS Thu 14 Aug 2003, 18:17 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]