Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Oil
I'm no scholar, but I'm not quite as stupid, or devious, as NS would like to
portray me. If I only said "commodity production" or "overproduction" and
didn't provide the detail of such analysis, that's one thing. But I have
provided those details to the list. And I am willing to provide them again,
offlist, to those interested.
NOBODY DENIES OIL IS A FINITE RESOURCE.
Comrade NS declares that the current, past, and future actions are dictated
by an imminent scarcity. How imminent? Forty years? 25? 100? And how
does that change the internal logic of production for profit?
I have answered the internal logic of oil production. It's in the archives,
and if I NS wants to explain what the hell pomo obscurantism is, I'll send
him his own private editions.
Yours in use and exchange,
dms
- Thread context:
- Re: Oil, (continued)
- Re: Oil,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Aug 2003, 13:12 GMT
- Re: Oil,
Xenon Zi-Neng Yuan Tue 12 Aug 2003, 14:36 GMT
- RE: Oil,
Jose G. Perez Tue 12 Aug 2003, 19:03 GMT
- RE: Oil,
Nicholas Siemensma Wed 13 Aug 2003, 03:39 GMT
- Re: Oil,
dms Wed 13 Aug 2003, 11:50 GMT
Re: oil,
Daru Rateau Mon 11 Aug 2003, 05:41 GMT
- Re: oil,
dms Mon 11 Aug 2003, 11:57 GMT
Re: Oil,
Paolo Chiocchetti Mon 11 Aug 2003, 13:49 GMT
- Re: Oil,
Jon Flanders Mon 11 Aug 2003, 15:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]