Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
religion
The stunningly thickheaded Mine wrote:
I can't beleive Henwood belongs to "ambigious,"which
implies he is "sort" of
religious or at least not an atheist, as it goes. Is
this Zizek influence? I
can't also beleive he is defending himself in this
"mumbo-jumbo" way. Really
embarrassing..
The bottom line is Henwood should have predicted
consequences of what he
said before letting these folks put his name on their
web site..
Why complain now ? too late...
Micheal, are you "ambigious" too? Why are you posting
this stuff on
marxmail?
My response:
1) I am not "sort" of religious. Did you read what I
wrote to the webmaster of the site? I think religion
and spirituality are a crock.
2) No one asked my permission to put my name on the
list. If they had, I'd have chosen "agnostic." I don't
know, you don't know, and no one does or can.
3) I asked Michael to forward my response.
4) Why do you fucking care?
Doug
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
- Thread context:
- Of wine and women,
DMS Thu 26 Jun 2003, 20:09 GMT
- Philip Foner and Ralph Chaplin [and some other historians as well],
Hunter Gray Thu 26 Jun 2003, 18:39 GMT
- Re: Critique of Rubin's theory on value,
MARIPOWER716 Thu 26 Jun 2003, 16:40 GMT
- Fw: Ascent/Decent,
DMS Thu 26 Jun 2003, 15:48 GMT
- religion,
Doug Henwood Thu 26 Jun 2003, 15:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: religion,
Craven, Jim Thu 26 Jun 2003, 18:31 GMT
- Re: religion,
Jim Farmelant Thu 26 Jun 2003, 19:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]