Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Coalition official casualties accounted for (updated 4th of June)
[ URL subbed for full text ]
Is it just me or would their casualties have been much lower if they'd
have taught their troops how to drive, fly and secure weaponry???
Hope that the graph comes out - it gives an idea of what's going to
happen I feel.
Domhnall.
Subject: Coalition official casualties accounted for (updated 4th of June)
http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=8144&lang=en
Coalition casualties accounted for (updated 4th of June)
04.06.2003 [21:53]
Coalition servicemen killed in the war against Iraq:
Total announced as of 4th of June: 214 (177 US, 37 UK)
Casualties divided by service branch:
81 (US Marine Corps)
87 (US Army)
5 (US Air Force)
3 (US Navy)
1 (US Special Operations Command)
6 (Royal Navy)
4 (Royal Air Force)
10 (Royal Marines)
17 (British Army)
Aircraft losses by aircraft type and nationality:
7 Attack Helicopters (US)
7 Transport Helicopters (US)
2 Attack Planes (US)
3 Fighters (US)
1 UAV (US)
2 Transport Helicopters (UK)
1 Strike Plane (UK)
1 UAV (UK)
- Thread context:
- Re: "Red" Politics / Red Blood -- And The Signal June 6 Anniversary, (continued)
- Recent discussions,
D OC Fri 06 Jun 2003, 15:56 GMT
- Coalition official casualties accounted for (updated 4th of June),
D OC Fri 06 Jun 2003, 15:45 GMT
- Lying by the Times vs lying by government; censorship in Iraq,
Eli Stephens Fri 06 Jun 2003, 15:25 GMT
- Restive Afghanistan: Update,
David Quarter Fri 06 Jun 2003, 15:07 GMT
- How the left responded to Cuba controversy,
Louis Proyect Fri 06 Jun 2003, 14:50 GMT
- Blair and WMDs,
James Daly Fri 06 Jun 2003, 13:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]