Re: [DEBATE] : (Fwd) Debating Wallerstein

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [DEBATE] : (Fwd) Debating Wallerstein
From: michael <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 10:56:49 -0700

People like Adam Smith and Josiah Tucker were quite clear that it was more
economical to establish economic control without the encumbrance of directly
running another country.

Louis Proyect wrote:

> Warren writes, "England never sought global political domination." That is
> because it didn't need to. ..."

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901

References:
- Re: [DEBATE] : (Fwd) Debating Wallerstein
  - From: Louis Proyect

Prev by Date: Re:Foster-Panitch debate on the relevance of "imperialism"
Next by Date: Re: Social Relations, Revolution, and Capital
Previous by thread: Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply
Next by thread: Feedback from Warren Wagar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- New LINKS magazine now online: Challenges in uniting the left, Ben C Sat 31 May 2003, 13:38 GMT
- Re: [DEBATE] : (Fwd) Debating Wallerstein, Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 13:05 GMT
  - Foster-Panitch debate on the relevance of "imperialism", Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 16:49 GMT
    - Message not available
      
      Feedback from Leo Panitch, plus my reply, Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 20:24 GMT
  - Re: [DEBATE] : (Fwd) Debating Wallerstein, michael Sat 31 May 2003, 17:57 GMT
  - Message not available
    - Feedback from Warren Wagar, Louis Proyect Sat 31 May 2003, 20:27 GMT
- Last bit on Cleese - can't resist, Tom O'Lincoln Sat 31 May 2003, 01:10 GMT
- The North Dakota Native Murders situation: "Keeping on, keeping on", Hunter Gray Fri 30 May 2003, 22:10 GMT
- What happened to Europe versus America?, Louis Proyect Fri 30 May 2003, 17:44 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]